On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 11:11:25AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 09:16:21AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > > index bf0f54c24f81..5098418c8389 100644 > > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > > @@ -22624,6 +22624,12 @@ L: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > S: Maintained > > > F: drivers/vfio/pci/mlx5/ > > > > > > +VFIO VIRTIO PCI DRIVER > > > +M: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > +L: kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > +S: Maintained > > > +F: drivers/vfio/pci/virtio > > > + > > > VFIO PCI DEVICE SPECIFIC DRIVERS > > > R: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > R: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Tying two subsystems together like this is going to cause pain when > > merging. God forbid there's something e.g. virtio net specific > > (and there's going to be for sure) - now we are talking 3 > > subsystems. > > Cross subsystem stuff is normal in the kernel. Yea. But it's completely spurious here - virtio has its own way to work with userspace which is vdpa and let's just use that. Keeps things nice and contained. > Drivers should be > placed in their most logical spot - this driver exposes a VFIO > interface so it belongs here. > > Your exact argument works the same from the VFIO perspective, someone > has to have code that belongs to them outside their little sphere > here. > > > Case in point all other virtio drivers are nicely grouped, have a common > > mailing list etc etc. This one is completely separate to the point > > where people won't even remember to copy the virtio mailing list. > > The virtio mailing list should probably be added to the maintainers > enry > > Jason _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
