On 2023-08-17 p.m.6:11, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
You mean virtio_net_common_hdr?
It is a typo, will correct it.
will do
I'm not sure I follow the reasoning. Because then hdr_len might be
sizeof(virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf), but sizeof(virtio_net_common_hdr) is
larger. So the same issue remains?
static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
[...]
if (vi->has_rss_hash_report) {
vi->hdr_len = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash); /* hdr_len will
be 20 bytes */
}
else if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF) ||
virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1))
vi->hdr_len = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf);
else
vi->hdr_len = sizeof(struct virtio_net_hdr);
[...]
}
When VIRTIO_NET_F_HASH_REPORT is enabled, hdr_len = 20 (as above); and
the size of virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf is 12, so virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf
is wrong, should use struct virtio_net_common_hdr here.
I understand in this specific instance. I'm just saying that using sizeof can
be wrong both in the new and old case.
This does not fix a real bug, as memcpy just uses hdr_len, which is correct.
Already have used hdr_len in the patch instead of sizeof(*hdr)
Indeed, everywhere this patches replaces the one with the other, you
have to verify that nothing was using sizeof(*hdr). Which would not be
visible from the truncated patch contents itself.
Have checked. Nothing is using sizeof(*hdr).
Thanks.
:-D
Change log
v1->v2
feedback from Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
feedback from Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxx>
1. change to use net-next tree.
2. move skb_vnet_common_hdr inside kernel file instead of the UAPI header.
Signed-off-by: Feng Liu <feliu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 1270c8d23463..03cf744de512 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -303,6 +303,13 @@ struct padded_vnet_hdr {
char padding[12];
};
+struct virtio_net_common_hdr {
+ union {
+ struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf mrg_hdr;
+ struct virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash hash_v1_hdr;
+ };
+};
Perhaps even add in struct virtio_net_hdr. As that is the original of
the three structs, and all the initial fields overlap.
But I didn't use virtio_net_hdr in this patch, is it redundant to put it
here？ what do you think?
That's true. But if we're going to add a helper to bind together alll the
virtio variants, then I think it should be there?
No strong opinion. Leave out if you prefer and no one else speaks up.
will do
@@ -1577,7 +1585,8 @@ static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
{
struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
struct sk_buff *skb;
- struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
+ struct virtio_net_common_hdr *common_hdr;
+ struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *mrg_hdr;
No more need for this second struct now that we have the union. That's
its whole purpose?
Yes, struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *mrg_hdr is not needed. Writing
mrg_hdr here is just to make the code look more concise, such as
mrg_hdr->hdr.flags, if mrg_hdr is not used, it should be written as
common_hdr->mrg_hdr.hdr.flags, I think it looks too long. what you think?
If we're going to continue to assign to different structs, then I'm honestly
not sure how much this patch buys us.
Adding virtio_net_hdr to the union also shortens the code btw. Then it
can be common_hdr->hdr.flags
Also, just a shorter variable name than common_hdr. Fine to call it hdr.
will do
if (unlikely(len < vi->hdr_len + ETH_HLEN)) {
pr_debug("%s: short packet %i\n", dev->name, len);
@@ -1597,18 +1606,19 @@ static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
if (unlikely(!skb))
return;
- hdr = skb_vnet_hdr(skb);
+ common_hdr = skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb);
if (dev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH && vi->has_rss_hash_report)
- virtio_skb_set_hash((const struct virtio_net_hdr_v1_hash *)hdr, skb);
+ virtio_skb_set_hash(&common_hdr->hash_v1_hdr, skb);
- if (hdr->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID)
+ mrg_hdr = &common_hdr->mrg_hdr;
+ if (mrg_hdr->hdr.flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_DATA_VALID)
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
- if (virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, &hdr->hdr,
+ if (virtio_net_hdr_to_skb(skb, &mrg_hdr->hdr,
virtio_is_little_endian(vi->vdev))) {
net_warn_ratelimited("%s: bad gso: type: %u, size: %u\n",
- dev->name, hdr->hdr.gso_type,
- hdr->hdr.gso_size);
+ dev->name, mrg_hdr->hdr.gso_type,
+ mrg_hdr->hdr.gso_size);
goto frame_err;
}
@@ -2105,7 +2115,7 @@ static int xmit_skb(struct send_queue *sq, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (can_push)
hdr = (struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *)(skb->data - hdr_len);
else
- hdr = skb_vnet_hdr(skb);
+ hdr = &skb_vnet_common_hdr(skb)->mrg_hdr;
if (virtio_net_hdr_from_skb(skb, &hdr->hdr,
virtio_is_little_endian(vi->vdev), false,
--
2.37.1 (Apple Git-137.1)
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
