Re: [PATCH net-next V4 2/3] virtio_net: support per queue interrupt coalesce command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 9:28 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-07-25 at 16:07 +0300, Gavin Li wrote:
> > Add interrupt_coalesce config in send_queue and receive_queue to cache user
> > config.
> >
> > Send per virtqueue interrupt moderation config to underlying device in
> > order to have more efficient interrupt moderation and cpu utilization of
> > guest VM.
> >
> > Additionally, address all the VQs when updating the global configuration,
> > as now the individual VQs configuration can diverge from the global
> > configuration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gavin Li <gavinl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> FTR, this patch is significantly different from the version previously
> acked/reviewed, I'm unsure if all the reviewers are ok with the new
> one.

Good point, and I plan to review this no later than next Monday and
offer my ack if necessary. Please hold this series now.

Thanks

>
> [...]
>
> >  static int virtnet_set_coalesce(struct net_device *dev,
> >                               struct ethtool_coalesce *ec,
> >                               struct kernel_ethtool_coalesce *kernel_coal,
> >                               struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> >  {
> >       struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
> > -     int ret, i, napi_weight;
> > +     int ret, queue_number, napi_weight;
> >       bool update_napi = false;
> >
> >       /* Can't change NAPI weight if the link is up */
> >       napi_weight = ec->tx_max_coalesced_frames ? NAPI_POLL_WEIGHT : 0;
> > -     if (napi_weight ^ vi->sq[0].napi.weight) {
> > -             if (dev->flags & IFF_UP)
> > -                     return -EBUSY;
> > -             else
> > -                     update_napi = true;
> > +     for (queue_number = 0; queue_number < vi->max_queue_pairs; queue_number++) {
> > +             ret = virtnet_should_update_vq_weight(dev->flags, napi_weight,
> > +                                                   vi->sq[queue_number].napi.weight,
> > +                                                   &update_napi);
> > +             if (ret)
> > +                     return ret;
> > +
> > +             if (update_napi) {
> > +                     /* All queues that belong to [queue_number, queue_count] will be
> > +                      * updated for the sake of simplicity, which might not be necessary
>
> It looks like the comment above still refers to the old code. Should
> be:
>         [queue_number, vi->max_queue_pairs]
>
> Otherwise LGTM, thanks!
>
> Paolo
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux