On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:58:34AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
Because the dgram sendmsg() path for AF_VSOCK acquires the socket lock it does not scale when many senders share a socket. Prior to this patch the socket lock is used to protect both reads and writes to the local_addr, remote_addr, transport, and buffer size variables of a vsock socket. What follows are the new protection schemes for these fields that ensure a race-free and usually lock-free multi-sender sendmsg() path for vsock dgrams. - local_addr local_addr changes as a result of binding a socket. The write path for local_addr is bind() and various vsock_auto_bind() call sites. After a socket has been bound via vsock_auto_bind() or bind(), subsequent calls to bind()/vsock_auto_bind() do not write to local_addr again. bind() rejects the user request and vsock_auto_bind() early exits. Therefore, the local addr can not change while a parallel thread is in sendmsg() and lock-free reads of local addr in sendmsg() are safe. Change: only acquire lock for auto-binding as-needed in sendmsg(). - buffer size variables Not used by dgram, so they do not need protection. No change. - remote_addr and transport Because a remote_addr update may result in a changed transport, but we would like to be able to read these two fields lock-free but coherently in the vsock send path, this patch packages these two fields into a new struct vsock_remote_info that is referenced by an RCU-protected pointer. Writes are synchronized as usual by the socket lock. Reads only take place in RCU read-side critical sections. When remote_addr or transport is updated, a new remote info is allocated. Old readers still see the old coherent remote_addr/transport pair, and new readers will refer to the new coherent. The coherency between remote_addr and transport previously provided by the socket lock alone is now also preserved by RCU, except with the highly-scalable lock-free read-side. Helpers are introduced for accessing and updating the new pointer. The new structure is contains an rcu_head so that kfree_rcu() can be used. This removes the need of writers to use synchronize_rcu() after freeing old structures which is simply more efficient and reduces code churn where remote_addr/transport are already being updated inside RCU read-side sections. Only virtio has been tested, but updates were necessary to the VMCI and hyperv code. Unfortunately the author does not have access to VMCI/hyperv systems so those changes are untested.
@Dexuan, @Vishnu, @Bryan, can you test this?
Perf Tests (results from patch v2) vCPUS: 16 Threads: 16 Payload: 4KB Test Runs: 5 Type: SOCK_DGRAM Before: 245.2 MB/s After: 509.2 MB/s (+107%) Notably, on the same test system, vsock dgram even outperforms multi-threaded UDP over virtio-net with vhost and MQ support enabled. Throughput metrics for single-threaded SOCK_DGRAM and single/multi-threaded SOCK_STREAM showed no statistically signficant throughput changes (lowest p-value reaching 0.27), with the range of the mean difference ranging between -5% to +1%.
Quite nice. Did you see any improvements also on stream/seqpacket sockets? However this is a big change, maybe I would move it to another series, because it takes time to be reviewed and tested properly. WDYT? Thanks, Stefano _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
