Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v4 7/8] vsock: Add lockless sendmsg() support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 12:58:34AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
Because the dgram sendmsg() path for AF_VSOCK acquires the socket lock
it does not scale when many senders share a socket.

Prior to this patch the socket lock is used to protect both reads and
writes to the local_addr, remote_addr, transport, and buffer size
variables of a vsock socket. What follows are the new protection schemes
for these fields that ensure a race-free and usually lock-free
multi-sender sendmsg() path for vsock dgrams.

- local_addr
local_addr changes as a result of binding a socket. The write path
for local_addr is bind() and various vsock_auto_bind() call sites.
After a socket has been bound via vsock_auto_bind() or bind(), subsequent
calls to bind()/vsock_auto_bind() do not write to local_addr again. bind()
rejects the user request and vsock_auto_bind() early exits.
Therefore, the local addr can not change while a parallel thread is
in sendmsg() and lock-free reads of local addr in sendmsg() are safe.
Change: only acquire lock for auto-binding as-needed in sendmsg().

- buffer size variables
Not used by dgram, so they do not need protection. No change.

- remote_addr and transport
Because a remote_addr update may result in a changed transport, but we
would like to be able to read these two fields lock-free but coherently
in the vsock send path, this patch packages these two fields into a new
struct vsock_remote_info that is referenced by an RCU-protected pointer.

Writes are synchronized as usual by the socket lock. Reads only take
place in RCU read-side critical sections. When remote_addr or transport
is updated, a new remote info is allocated. Old readers still see the
old coherent remote_addr/transport pair, and new readers will refer to
the new coherent. The coherency between remote_addr and transport
previously provided by the socket lock alone is now also preserved by
RCU, except with the highly-scalable lock-free read-side.

Helpers are introduced for accessing and updating the new pointer.

The new structure is contains an rcu_head so that kfree_rcu() can be
used. This removes the need of writers to use synchronize_rcu() after
freeing old structures which is simply more efficient and reduces code
churn where remote_addr/transport are already being updated inside RCU
read-side sections.

Only virtio has been tested, but updates were necessary to the VMCI and
hyperv code. Unfortunately the author does not have access to
VMCI/hyperv systems so those changes are untested.

@Dexuan, @Vishnu, @Bryan, can you test this?


Perf Tests (results from patch v2)
vCPUS: 16
Threads: 16
Payload: 4KB
Test Runs: 5
Type: SOCK_DGRAM

Before: 245.2 MB/s
After: 509.2 MB/s (+107%)

Notably, on the same test system, vsock dgram even outperforms
multi-threaded UDP over virtio-net with vhost and MQ support enabled.

Throughput metrics for single-threaded SOCK_DGRAM and
single/multi-threaded SOCK_STREAM showed no statistically signficant
throughput changes (lowest p-value reaching 0.27), with the range of the
mean difference ranging between -5% to +1%.


Quite nice. Did you see any improvements also on stream/seqpacket
sockets?

However this is a big change, maybe I would move it to another series,
because it takes time to be reviewed and tested properly.

WDYT?

Thanks,
Stefano

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux