On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:27 AM Wenliang Wang
<wangwenliang.1995@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> For multi-queue and large ring-size use case, the following error
> occurred when free_unused_bufs:
> rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU.
>
> Fixes: 986a4f4d452d ("virtio_net: multiqueue support")
> Signed-off-by: Wenliang Wang <wangwenliang.1995@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v2:
> -add need_resched check.
> -apply same logic to sq.
> v3:
> -use cond_resched instead.
> v4:
> -add fixes tag
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 8d8038538fc4..a12ae26db0e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -3560,12 +3560,14 @@ static void free_unused_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> struct virtqueue *vq = vi->sq[i].vq;
> while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)) != NULL)
> virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(vq, buf);
> + cond_resched();
Does this really address the case when the virtqueue is very large?
Thanks
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> struct virtqueue *vq = vi->rq[i].vq;
> while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)) != NULL)
> virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(vq, buf);
> + cond_resched();
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.20.1
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
