On Sat, 2023-04-29 at 23:47 +0800, Wenliang Wang wrote: > For multi-queue and large ring-size use case, the following error > occurred when free_unused_bufs: > rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU. > > Signed-off-by: Wenliang Wang <wangwenliang.1995@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Net next is currently closed, but this patch could arguably land on the net tree - assuming Micheal agrees. In that case you should include a suitable Fixes tag - reposting a new version. > --- > v2: > -add need_resched check. > -apply same logic to sq. > v3: > -use cond_resched instead. > --- > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index ea1bd4bb326d..744bdc8a1abd 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -3559,12 +3559,14 @@ static void free_unused_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi) > struct virtqueue *vq = vi->sq[i].vq; > while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)) != NULL) > virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(vq, buf); > + cond_resched(); Note that on v1 Xuan Zhuo suggested to do the above check only every a low fixed number of buffer. I think the current code is a better option, as the need_resched() check is very cheap and the overall code simpler. In any case, when submitting a new revision, please explicitly CC whoever gave feedback on previous ones. Thanks, Paolo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization