Re: [PATCH net-next] xsk: introduce xsk_dma_ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 06:50:59 -0700, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 15:31:04 +0800 Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > I am not particularly familiar with dma-bufs. I want to know if this mechanism
> > can solve the problem of virtio-net.
> >
> > I saw this framework, allowing the driver do something inside the ops of
> > dma-bufs.
> >
> > If so, is it possible to propose a new patch based on dma-bufs?
>
> I haven't looked in detail, maybe Olek has? AFAIU you'd need to rework
> uAPI of XSK to allow user to pass in a dma-buf region rather than just
> a user VA.

This seems to be a big job. Can we first receive this patch.

Thanks.

> So it may be a larger effort but architecturally it may be
> the right solution.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux