On Sun, Apr 09, 2023 at 10:17:51PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This replaces 'skb_queue_tail()' with 'virtio_vsock_skb_queue_tail()'. The first one uses 'spin_lock_irqsave()', second uses 'spin_lock_bh()'. There is no need to disable interrupts in the loopback transport as there is no access to the queue with skbs from interrupt context. Both virtio and vhost transports work in the same way.
Yep, this is a good point!
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
LGTM! (net-next material) Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Stefano
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c index e3afc0c866f5..5c6360df1f31 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c @@ -31,8 +31,7 @@ static int vsock_loopback_send_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb) struct vsock_loopback *vsock = &the_vsock_loopback; int len = skb->len; - skb_queue_tail(&vsock->pkt_queue, skb); - + virtio_vsock_skb_queue_tail(&vsock->pkt_queue, skb); queue_work(vsock->workqueue, &vsock->pkt_work); return len; -- 2.25.1
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
