Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] vsock/test: update expected return values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 01:14:01AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This updates expected return values for invalid buffer test. Now such
values are returned from transport, not from af_vsock.c.

Since only virtio transport supports it for now, it's okay.
In the future we should make sure that we have the same behavior between transports.

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>


Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 3de10dbb50f5..a91d0ef963be 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ static void test_seqpacket_invalid_rec_buffer_server(const struct test_opts *opt
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

-	if (errno != ENOMEM) {
+	if (errno != EFAULT) {
		perror("unexpected errno of 'broken_buf'");
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void test_inv_buf_client(const struct test_opts *opts, bool stream)
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}

-	if (errno != ENOMEM) {
+	if (errno != EFAULT) {
		fprintf(stderr, "unexpected recv(2) errno %d\n", errno);
		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
	}
--
2.25.1


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux