Re: [syzbot] [kvm?] [net?] [virt?] general protection fault in virtio_transport_purge_skbs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 10:06 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:55 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 9:31 AM Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bobby,
> > > can you take a look at this report?
> > >
> > > It seems related to the changes we made to support skbuff.
> >
> > Could it be a problem of concurrent access to pkt_queue ?
> >
> > IIUC we should hold pkt_queue.lock when we call skb_queue_splice_init()
> > and remove pkt_list_lock. (or hold pkt_list_lock when calling
> > virtio_transport_purge_skbs, but pkt_list_lock seems useless now that
> > we use skbuff)
> >
>

Patch posted here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230324115450.11268-1-sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx/

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux