Re: [PATCH vhost v5 05/11] virtio_ring: packed: support premapped

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 15:37:08 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 2:57 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:47:56 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 2:30 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > virtio core only supports virtual addresses, dma is completed in virtio
> > > > core.
> > > >
> > > > In some scenarios (such as the AF_XDP), the memory is allocated
> > > > and DMA mapping is completed in advance, so it is necessary for us to
> > > > support passing the DMA address to virtio core.
> > > >
> > > > Drives can use sg->dma_address to pass the mapped dma address to virtio
> > > > core. If one sg->dma_address is used then all sgs must use
> > > > sg->dma_address, otherwise all must be null when passing it to the APIs
> > > > of virtio.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > index 1c3084a8f4e3..df6d514a681a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct vring_desc_state_split {
> > > >  struct vring_desc_state_packed {
> > > >         void *data;                     /* Data for callback. */
> > > >         struct vring_packed_desc *indir_desc; /* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
> > > > +       u64 flags;                      /* State flags. */
> > >
> > > I'd use u32 then there would be no need for the compiler to pad the
> > > structure in both 32 and 64 bit archs.
> >
> >
> > OK.
> >
> > I just try to keep the same as split. Maybe I should add some notes,
> > indicating that there is some difference between split.
>
> It would be better to use a u32 + explicit pad for split in this case.

Will fix.

Thanks.


>
> Thanks
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux