On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:53:40PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
On 23.03.2023 13:48, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 01:01:40PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
Hello Stefano,
thanks for review!
You're welcome!
Since both patches are R-b, i can wait for a few days, then send this
as 'net-next'?
Yep, maybe even this series could have been directly without RFC ;-)
"directly", You mean 'net' tag? Of just without RFC, like [PATCH v5]. In this case
it will be merged to 'net' right?
Sorry for the confusion. I meant without RFC but with net-next.
Being enhancements and not fixes this is definitely net-next material,
so even in RFCs you can already use the net-next tag, so the reviewer
knows which branch to apply them to. (It's not super important since
being RFCs it's expected that it's not complete, but it's definitely an
help for the reviewer).
Speaking of the RFC, we usually use it for patches that we don't think
are ready to be merged. But when they reach a good state (like this
series for example), we can start publishing them already without the
RFC tag.
Anyway, if you are not sure, use RFC and then when a maintainer has
reviewed them all, surely you can remove the RFC tag.
Hope this helps, at least that's what I usually do, so don't take that
as a strict rule ;-)
Thanks,
Stefano
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
