Re: [PATCH v4] virtio: add VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:21:05AM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:10:31 +0300, Viktor Prutyanov <viktor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > According to VirtIO spec v1.2, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature
> > indicates that the driver passes extra data along with the queue
> > notifications.
> >
> > In a split queue case, the extra data is 16-bit available index. In a
> > packed queue case, the extra data is 1-bit wrap counter and 15-bit
> > available index.
> >
> > Add support for this feature for MMIO, channel I/O and modern PCI
> > transports.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viktor Prutyanov <viktor@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  v4: remove VP_NOTIFY macro and legacy PCI support, add
> >     virtio_ccw_kvm_notify_with_data to virtio_ccw
> >  v3: support feature in virtio_ccw, remove VM_NOTIFY, use avail_idx_shadow,
> >     remove byte swap, rename to vring_notification_data
> >  v2: reject the feature in virtio_ccw, replace __le32 with u32
> >
> >  Tested with disabled VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA on qemu-system-s390x
> >  (virtio-blk-ccw), qemu-system-riscv64 (virtio-blk-device,
> >  virtio-rng-device), qemu-system-x86_64 (virtio-blk-pci, virtio-net-pci)
> >  to make sure nothing is broken.
> >  Tested with enabled VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA on 64-bit RISC-V Linux
> >  and my hardware implementation of virtio-rng.
> >
> >  drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c   | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c       | 14 +++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c       | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/virtio_ring.h        |  2 ++
> >  include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h |  6 ++++++
> >  6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > index 954fc31b4bc7..3619676effb8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > @@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ static void virtio_ccw_drop_indicator(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> >  	ccw_device_dma_free(vcdev->cdev, thinint_area, sizeof(*thinint_area));
> >  }
> >
> > -static bool virtio_ccw_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > +static inline bool virtio_ccw_do_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq, u32 data)
> >  {
> >  	struct virtio_ccw_vq_info *info = vq->priv;
> >  	struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev;
> > @@ -402,12 +402,22 @@ static bool virtio_ccw_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >  	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct subchannel_id) != sizeof(unsigned int));
> >  	info->cookie = kvm_hypercall3(KVM_S390_VIRTIO_CCW_NOTIFY,
> >  				      *((unsigned int *)&schid),
> > -				      vq->index, info->cookie);
> > +				      data, info->cookie);
> >  	if (info->cookie < 0)
> >  		return false;
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool virtio_ccw_kvm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > +	return virtio_ccw_do_kvm_notify(vq, vq->index);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool virtio_ccw_kvm_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > +	return virtio_ccw_do_kvm_notify(vq, vring_notification_data(vq));
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int virtio_ccw_read_vq_conf(struct virtio_ccw_device *vcdev,
> >  				   struct ccw1 *ccw, int index)
> >  {
> > @@ -501,6 +511,9 @@ static struct virtqueue *virtio_ccw_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> >  	u64 queue;
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >  	bool may_reduce;
> > +	bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *vq) = __virtio_test_bit(vdev,
> > +		VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) ?
> > +		virtio_ccw_kvm_notify_with_data : virtio_ccw_kvm_notify;
> >
> >  	/* Allocate queue. */
> >  	info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct virtio_ccw_vq_info), GFP_KERNEL);
> > @@ -524,7 +537,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *virtio_ccw_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev,
> >  	may_reduce = vcdev->revision > 0;
> >  	vq = vring_create_virtqueue(i, info->num, KVM_VIRTIO_CCW_RING_ALIGN,
> >  				    vdev, true, may_reduce, ctx,
> > -				    virtio_ccw_kvm_notify, callback, name);
> > +				    notify, callback, name);
> >
> >  	if (!vq) {
> >  		/* For now, we fail if we can't get the requested size. */
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > index 3ff746e3f24a..7c16e622c33d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.cv
> > @@ -285,6 +285,16 @@ static bool vm_notify(struct virtqueue *vq)
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool vm_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > +	struct virtio_mmio_device *vm_dev = to_virtio_mmio_device(vq->vdev);
> > +	u32 data = vring_notification_data(vq);
> > +
> > +	writel(data, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUE_NOTIFY);
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* Notify all virtqueues on an interrupt. */
> >  static irqreturn_t vm_interrupt(int irq, void *opaque)
> >  {
> > @@ -368,6 +378,8 @@ static struct virtqueue *vm_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int in
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >  	unsigned int num;
> >  	int err;
> > +	bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *vq) = __virtio_test_bit(vdev,
> > +		VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) ? vm_notify_with_data : vm_notify;
> 
> 
> Can we optimize this line?
> 
> Thanks.

why bother? it's setup time ..

> >
> >  	if (!name)
> >  		return NULL;
> > @@ -397,7 +409,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vm_setup_vq(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned int in
> >
> >  	/* Create the vring */
> >  	vq = vring_create_virtqueue(index, num, VIRTIO_MMIO_VRING_ALIGN, vdev,
> > -				 true, true, ctx, vm_notify, callback, name);
> > +				 true, true, ctx, notify, callback, name);
> >  	if (!vq) {
> >  		err = -ENOMEM;
> >  		goto error_new_virtqueue;
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> > index 9e496e288cfa..9cc56f463dba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern.c
> > @@ -288,6 +288,15 @@ static u16 vp_config_vector(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev, u16 vector)
> >  	return vp_modern_config_vector(&vp_dev->mdev, vector);
> >  }
> >
> > +static bool vp_notify_with_data(struct virtqueue *vq)
> > +{
> > +	u32 data = vring_notification_data(vq);
> > +
> > +	iowrite32(data, (void __iomem *)vq->priv);
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
> >  				  struct virtio_pci_vq_info *info,
> >  				  unsigned int index,
> > @@ -301,6 +310,8 @@ static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
> >  	struct virtqueue *vq;
> >  	u16 num;
> >  	int err;
> > +	bool (*notify)(struct virtqueue *vq) = __virtio_test_bit(&vp_dev->vdev,
> > +		VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA) ? vp_notify_with_data : vp_notify;
> >
> >  	if (index >= vp_modern_get_num_queues(mdev))
> >  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > @@ -321,7 +332,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *setup_vq(struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev,
> >  	vq = vring_create_virtqueue(index, num,
> >  				    SMP_CACHE_BYTES, &vp_dev->vdev,
> >  				    true, true, ctx,
> > -				    vp_notify, callback, name);
> > +				    notify, callback, name);
> >  	if (!vq)
> >  		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index 4c3bb0ddeb9b..837875cc3190 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -2752,6 +2752,21 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_del_virtqueue);
> >
> > +u32 vring_notification_data(struct virtqueue *_vq)
> > +{
> > +	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
> > +	u16 next;
> > +
> > +	if (vq->packed_ring)
> > +		next = (vq->packed.next_avail_idx & ~(1 << 15)) |
> > +			vq->packed.avail_wrap_counter << 15;
> > +	else
> > +		next = vq->split.avail_idx_shadow;
> > +
> > +	return next << 16 | _vq->index;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vring_notification_data);
> > +
> >  /* Manipulates transport-specific feature bits. */
> >  void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >  {
> > @@ -2771,6 +2786,8 @@ void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >  			break;
> >  		case VIRTIO_F_ORDER_PLATFORM:
> >  			break;
> > +		case VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA:
> > +			break;
> >  		default:
> >  			/* We don't understand this bit. */
> >  			__virtio_clear_bit(vdev, i);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > index 8b95b69ef694..2550c9170f4f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_ring.h
> > @@ -117,4 +117,6 @@ void vring_del_virtqueue(struct virtqueue *vq);
> >  void vring_transport_features(struct virtio_device *vdev);
> >
> >  irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq);
> > +
> > +u32 vring_notification_data(struct virtqueue *_vq);
> >  #endif /* _LINUX_VIRTIO_RING_H */
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > index 3c05162bc988..2c712c654165 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_config.h
> > @@ -99,6 +99,12 @@
> >   */
> >  #define VIRTIO_F_SR_IOV			37
> >
> > +/*
> > + * This feature indicates that the driver passes extra data (besides
> > + * identifying the virtqueue) in its device notifications.
> > + */
> > +#define VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA	38
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * This feature indicates that the driver can reset a queue individually.
> >   */
> > --
> > 2.35.1
> >

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux