On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 09:46:10PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without return to af_vsock.c. Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/2c52aa26-8181-d37a-bccd-a86bd3cbc6e1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ Changelog: v1 -> v2: - If sent something, return number of bytes sent (even in case of error). Return error only if failed to sent first skbuff. net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c index 6564192e7f20..3fdf1433ec28 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c @@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, const struct virtio_transport *t_ops; struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs; u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len; - struct sk_buff *skb; + u32 rest_len; + int ret; info->type = virtio_transport_get_type(sk_vsock(vsk)); @@ -216,10 +217,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, vvs = vsk->trans; - /* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */ - if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE) - pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE; - /* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */ pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len); @@ -227,17 +224,45 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk, if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW) return pkt_len; - skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, pkt_len, - src_cid, src_port, - dst_cid, dst_port); - if (!skb) { - virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len); - return -ENOMEM; - } + ret = 0; + rest_len = pkt_len; + + do { + struct sk_buff *skb; + size_t skb_len; + + skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len); + + skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len, + src_cid, src_port, + dst_cid, dst_port); + if (!skb) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + break; + } + + virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb); + + ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb); + + if (ret < 0) + break; - virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb); + rest_len -= skb_len;
t_ops->send_pkt() is returning the number of bytes sent. Current implementations always return `skb_len`, so there should be no problem, but it would be better to put a comment here, or we should handle the case where ret != skb_len to avoid future issues.
+ } while (rest_len); - return t_ops->send_pkt(skb); + /* Don't call this function with zero as argument: + * it tries to acquire spinlock and such argument + * makes this call useless.
Good point, can we do the same also for virtio_transport_get_credit()? (Maybe in a separate patch) I'm thinking if may be better to do it directly inside the functions, but I don't have a strong opinion on that since we only call them here. Thanks, Stefano
+ */ + if (rest_len) + virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, rest_len); + + /* Return number of bytes, if any data has been sent. */ + if (rest_len != pkt_len) + ret = pkt_len - rest_len; + + return ret; } static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, -- 2.25.1
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
