Feng Liu via Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > According to kernel coding style [1], defining inline functions is not > necessary and beneficial for simple functions. Hence clean up the code > by removing the inline keyword. > > It is verified with GCC 12.2.0, the generated code with/without inline > is same. Additionally tested with pktgen and iperf, and verified the > result, the pps test results are the same in the cases of with/without > inline. > > Iperf and pps of pktgen for virtio-net didn't change before and after > the change. > > [1] > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.2-rc3/process/coding-style.html#the-inline-disease > > Signed-off-by: Feng Liu <feliu@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Parav Pandit <parav@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Gavin Li <gavinl@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Bodong Wang <bodong@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > index 41144b5246a8..806cc44eae64 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static void vring_free(struct virtqueue *_vq); > > #define to_vvq(_vq) container_of(_vq, struct vring_virtqueue, vq) > > -static inline bool virtqueue_use_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, > +static bool virtqueue_use_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, > unsigned int total_sg) > { > /* > @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ static void vring_free_queue(struct virtio_device *vdev, size_t size, > * making all of the arch DMA ops work on the vring device itself > * is a mess. > */ > -static inline struct device *vring_dma_dev(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq) > +static struct device *vring_dma_dev(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq) > { > return vq->dma_dev; > } > @@ -784,7 +784,7 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head, > } > } > > -static inline bool more_used_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq) > +static inline more_used_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq) > { > return vq->last_used_idx != virtio16_to_cpu(vq->vq.vdev, > vq->split.vring.used->idx); > @@ -1172,12 +1172,12 @@ static int virtqueue_resize_split(struct virtqueue *_vq, u32 num) > /* > * Packed ring specific functions - *_packed(). > */ > -static inline bool packed_used_wrap_counter(u16 last_used_idx) > +static bool packed_used_wrap_counter(u16 last_used_idx) > { > return !!(last_used_idx & (1 << VRING_PACKED_EVENT_F_WRAP_CTR)); > } > > -static inline u16 packed_last_used(u16 last_used_idx) > +static u16 packed_last_used(u16 last_used_idx) > { > return last_used_idx & ~(-(1 << VRING_PACKED_EVENT_F_WRAP_CTR)); > } > @@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@ static inline bool is_used_desc_packed(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq, > return avail == used && used == used_wrap_counter; > } > > -static inline bool more_used_packed(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq) > +static bool more_used_packed(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq) > { > u16 last_used; > u16 last_used_idx; > -- > 2.34.1 > > _______________________________________________ > Virtualization mailing list > Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization -- Would you offer your throat to the wolf with the red roses? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
