Re: [PATCH v4 12/15] vdpa: block migration if device has unsupported features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2023/2/24 23:54, Eugenio Pérez 写道:
A vdpa net device must initialize with SVQ in order to be migratable at
this moment, and initialization code verifies some conditions.  If the
device is not initialized with the x-svq parameter, it will not expose
_F_LOG so the vhost subsystem will block VM migration from its
initialization.

Next patches change this, so we need to verify migration conditions
differently.

QEMU only supports a subset of net features in SVQ, and it cannot
migrate state that cannot track or restore in the destination.  Add a
migration blocker if the device offer an unsupported feature.

Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
v3: add mirgation blocker properly so vhost_dev can handle it.
---
  net/vhost-vdpa.c | 12 ++++++++----
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/vhost-vdpa.c b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
index 4f983df000..094dc1c2d0 100644
--- a/net/vhost-vdpa.c
+++ b/net/vhost-vdpa.c
@@ -795,7 +795,8 @@ static NetClientState *net_vhost_vdpa_init(NetClientState *peer,
                                         int nvqs,
                                         bool is_datapath,
                                         bool svq,
-                                       struct vhost_vdpa_iova_range iova_range)
+                                       struct vhost_vdpa_iova_range iova_range,
+                                       uint64_t features)
  {
      NetClientState *nc = NULL;
      VhostVDPAState *s;
@@ -818,7 +819,10 @@ static NetClientState *net_vhost_vdpa_init(NetClientState *peer,
      s->vhost_vdpa.shadow_vqs_enabled = svq;
      s->vhost_vdpa.iova_range = iova_range;
      s->vhost_vdpa.shadow_data = svq;
-    if (!is_datapath) {
+    if (queue_pair_index == 0) {
+        vhost_vdpa_net_valid_svq_features(features,
+                                          &s->vhost_vdpa.migration_blocker);


Since we do validation at initialization, is this necessary to valid once again in other places?

Thanks


+    } else if (!is_datapath) {
          s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer = qemu_memalign(qemu_real_host_page_size(),
                                              vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len());
          memset(s->cvq_cmd_out_buffer, 0, vhost_vdpa_net_cvq_cmd_page_len());
@@ -956,7 +960,7 @@ int net_init_vhost_vdpa(const Netdev *netdev, const char *name,
      for (i = 0; i < queue_pairs; i++) {
          ncs[i] = net_vhost_vdpa_init(peer, TYPE_VHOST_VDPA, name,
                                       vdpa_device_fd, i, 2, true, opts->x_svq,
-                                     iova_range);
+                                     iova_range, features);
          if (!ncs[i])
              goto err;
      }
@@ -964,7 +968,7 @@ int net_init_vhost_vdpa(const Netdev *netdev, const char *name,
      if (has_cvq) {
          nc = net_vhost_vdpa_init(peer, TYPE_VHOST_VDPA, name,
                                   vdpa_device_fd, i, 1, false,
-                                 opts->x_svq, iova_range);
+                                 opts->x_svq, iova_range, features);
          if (!nc)
              goto err;
      }

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux