On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 6:11 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 01:35:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 8:15 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 08:08:43PM +0800, Nanyong Sun wrote: > > > > From: Rong Wang <wangrong68@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Once enable iommu domain for one device, the MSI > > > > translation tables have to be there for software-managed MSI. > > > > Otherwise, platform with software-managed MSI without an > > > > irq bypass function, can not get a correct memory write event > > > > from pcie, will not get irqs. > > > > The solution is to obtain the MSI phy base address from > > > > iommu reserved region, and set it to iommu MSI cookie, > > > > then translation tables will be created while request irq. > > > > > > Probably not what anyone wants to hear, but I would prefer we not add > > > more uses of this stuff. It looks like we have to get rid of > > > iommu_get_msi_cookie() :\ > > > > > > I'd like it if vdpa could move to iommufd not keep copying stuff from > > > it.. > > > > Yes, but we probably need a patch for -stable. > > Hmm do we? this looks like it's enabling new platforms is not a bugfix... I think we haven't limited vDPA to any specific arch in the past? Thanks > > > > > > > Also the iommu_group_has_isolated_msi() check is missing on the vdpa > > > path, and it is missing the iommu ownership mechanism. > > > > Ok. > > > > > > > > Also which in-tree VDPA driver that uses the iommu runs on ARM? Please > > > > ifcvf and vp_vpda are two drivers that use platform IOMMU. > > > > Thanks > > > > > don't propose core changes for unmerged drivers. :( > > > > > > Jason > > > > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
