On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 01:53:40PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > Well, having GFP parameters is not a strict kernel convention. There are > > places doing it differently and have sleeping and atomic variants of > > APIs. I have to say I like the latter more. But given that this leads to > > an invasion of API functions here which all do the same under the hood, I > > agree it is better to go with a GFP parameter here. > > Ok, I think we are done with this series, I'll stick it in linux-next > for a bit and send you a PR so the trees stay in sync This series mostly touches parts outside of IOMMUFD, so we should follow the process here and let this reach linux-next via the IOMMU tree. Please send me a new version and I will put it into a separate branch where you can pull it from. Regards, Joerg _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
