On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 02:07:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Al Viro said: > > """ > Since "vhost/scsi: fix reuse of &vq->iov[out] in response" > we have this: > cmd->tvc_resp_iov = vq->iov[vc.out]; > cmd->tvc_in_iovs = vc.in; > combined with > iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, ITER_DEST, &cmd->tvc_resp_iov, > cmd->tvc_in_iovs, sizeof(v_rsp)); > in vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work(). We used to have ->tvc_resp_iov > _pointing_ to vq->iov[vc.out]; back then iov_iter_init() asked to > set an iovec-backed iov_iter over the tail of vq->iov[], with > length being the amount of iovecs in the tail. > > Now we have a copy of one element of that array. Fortunately, the members > following it in the containing structure are two non-NULL kernel pointers, > so copy_to_iter() will not copy anything beyond the first iovec - kernel > pointer is not (on the majority of architectures) going to be accepted by > access_ok() in copyout() and it won't be skipped since the "length" (in > reality - another non-NULL kernel pointer) won't be zero. > > So it's not going to give a guest-to-qemu escalation, but it's definitely > a bug. Frankly, my preference would be to verify that the very first iovec > is long enough to hold rsp_size. Due to the above, any users that try to > give us vq->iov[vc.out].iov_len < sizeof(struct virtio_scsi_cmd_resp) > would currently get a failure in vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work() > anyway. > """ > > However, the spec doesn't say anything about the legacy descriptor > layout for the respone. So this patch tries to not assume the response > to reside in a single separate descriptor which is what commit > 79c14141a487 ("vhost/scsi: Convert completion path to use") tries to > achieve towards to ANY_LAYOUT. > > This is done by allocating and using dedicate resp iov in the > command. To be safety, start with UIO_MAXIOV to be consistent with the > vhost core. > > Testing with the hacked virtio-scsi driver that use 1 descriptor for 1 > byte in the response. > > Reported-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: a77ec83a5789 ("vhost/scsi: fix reuse of &vq->iov[out] in response") > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c > index dca6346d75b3..7d6d70072603 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/scsi.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/scsi.c > @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ struct vhost_scsi_cmd { > struct scatterlist *tvc_prot_sgl; > struct page **tvc_upages; > /* Pointer to response header iovec */ > - struct iovec tvc_resp_iov; > + struct iovec *tvc_resp_iov; > /* Pointer to vhost_scsi for our device */ > struct vhost_scsi *tvc_vhost; > /* Pointer to vhost_virtqueue for the cmd */ > @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ static void vhost_scsi_complete_cmd_work(struct vhost_work *work) > memcpy(v_rsp.sense, cmd->tvc_sense_buf, > se_cmd->scsi_sense_length); > > - iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, ITER_DEST, &cmd->tvc_resp_iov, > + iov_iter_init(&iov_iter, ITER_DEST, cmd->tvc_resp_iov, > cmd->tvc_in_iovs, sizeof(v_rsp)); > ret = copy_to_iter(&v_rsp, sizeof(v_rsp), &iov_iter); > if (likely(ret == sizeof(v_rsp))) { > @@ -594,6 +594,7 @@ vhost_scsi_get_cmd(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_scsi_tpg *tpg, > struct vhost_scsi_cmd *cmd; > struct vhost_scsi_nexus *tv_nexus; > struct scatterlist *sg, *prot_sg; > + struct iovec *tvc_resp_iov; > struct page **pages; > int tag; > > @@ -613,6 +614,7 @@ vhost_scsi_get_cmd(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_scsi_tpg *tpg, > sg = cmd->tvc_sgl; > prot_sg = cmd->tvc_prot_sgl; > pages = cmd->tvc_upages; > + tvc_resp_iov = cmd->tvc_resp_iov; > memset(cmd, 0, sizeof(*cmd)); > cmd->tvc_sgl = sg; > cmd->tvc_prot_sgl = prot_sg; > @@ -625,6 +627,7 @@ vhost_scsi_get_cmd(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct vhost_scsi_tpg *tpg, > cmd->tvc_data_direction = data_direction; > cmd->tvc_nexus = tv_nexus; > cmd->inflight = vhost_scsi_get_inflight(vq); > + cmd->tvc_resp_iov = tvc_resp_iov; > > memcpy(cmd->tvc_cdb, cdb, VHOST_SCSI_MAX_CDB_SIZE); > > @@ -935,7 +938,7 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > struct iov_iter in_iter, prot_iter, data_iter; > u64 tag; > u32 exp_data_len, data_direction; > - int ret, prot_bytes, c = 0; > + int ret, prot_bytes, i, c = 0; > u16 lun; > u8 task_attr; > bool t10_pi = vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_SCSI_F_T10_PI); > @@ -1092,7 +1095,8 @@ vhost_scsi_handle_vq(struct vhost_scsi *vs, struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > } > cmd->tvc_vhost = vs; > cmd->tvc_vq = vq; > - cmd->tvc_resp_iov = vq->iov[vc.out]; > + for (i = 0; i < vc.in ; i++) > + cmd->tvc_resp_iov[i] = vq->iov[vc.out + i]; Where is the guarantee that vc.in < UIO_MAXIOV? > cmd->tvc_in_iovs = vc.in; > > pr_debug("vhost_scsi got command opcode: %#02x, lun: %d\n", > @@ -1461,6 +1465,7 @@ static void vhost_scsi_destroy_vq_cmds(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > kfree(tv_cmd->tvc_sgl); > kfree(tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl); > kfree(tv_cmd->tvc_upages); > + kfree(tv_cmd->tvc_resp_iov); > } > > sbitmap_free(&svq->scsi_tags); > @@ -1508,6 +1513,14 @@ static int vhost_scsi_setup_vq_cmds(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, int max_cmds) > goto out; > } > > + tv_cmd->tvc_resp_iov = kcalloc(UIO_MAXIOV, > + sizeof(struct page *), > + GFP_KERNEL); Should sizeof(struct page *) be sizeof(struct iovec)? > + if (!tv_cmd->tvc_resp_iov) { > + pr_err("Unable to allocate tv_cmd->tvc_resp_iov\n"); > + goto out; > + } > + > tv_cmd->tvc_prot_sgl = kcalloc(VHOST_SCSI_PREALLOC_PROT_SGLS, > sizeof(struct scatterlist), > GFP_KERNEL); > -- > 2.25.1 >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization