On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 11:20:34AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Hi Viresh, > > > I understand that it is okay to pass the maintainership, within the > > company, for platform specific parts from one person to another, since > > they have the best knowledge of the code and are the only one > > interested in maintaining it too. > > > > But what is the rule for generic drivers like this one ? > > Dunno if this is really a rule, but if a maintainer steps out and makes > sure there is someone to pick up the work, this is more than welcome. > Way better than a stale entry in the MAINTAINERS file. > > I mean, it does not limit the chance to have further maintainers, for > example. I believe in meritocracy here. Those who do and collaborate, > shall get responsibility. Exactly. I'd like to see Jian Jun Chen do and collaborate first. > If not, then not. We can fix this, too, if > needed. > > What is the reason for your question? > > All the best, > > Wolfram > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization