On Mon, 2022-11-21 at 12:01 +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 11:20:21AM +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 09:35 -0800, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > > index 35d7eedb5e8e..6c0b2d4da3fe 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > > @@ -3,10 +3,129 @@
> > > #define _LINUX_VIRTIO_VSOCK_H
> > >
> > > #include <uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h>
> > > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> > > #include <linux/socket.h>
> > > #include <net/sock.h>
> > > #include <net/af_vsock.h>
> > >
> > > +#define VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_HEADROOM (sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_hdr))
> > > +
> > > +enum virtio_vsock_skb_flags {
> > > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_FLAGS_REPLY = BIT(0),
> > > + VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_FLAGS_TAP_DELIVERED = BIT(1),
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static inline struct virtio_vsock_hdr *virtio_vsock_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > +{
> > > + return (struct virtio_vsock_hdr *)skb->head;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline bool virtio_vsock_skb_reply(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > > +{
> > > + return skb->_skb_refdst & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_FLAGS_REPLY;
> > > +}
> >
> > I'm sorry for the late feedback. The above is extremelly risky: if the
> > skb will land later into the networking stack, we could experience the
> > most difficult to track bugs.
> >
> > You should use the skb control buffer instead (skb->cb), with the
> > additional benefit you could use e.g. bool - the compiler could emit
> > better code to manipulate such fields - and you will not need to clear
> > the field before release nor enqueue.
> >
> > [...]
> >
>
> Hey Paolo, thank you for the review. For my own learning, this would
> happen presumably when the skb is dropped? And I assume we don't see
> this in sockmap because it is always cleared before leaving sockmap's
> hands? I sanity checked this patch with an out-of-tree patch I have that
> uses the networking stack, but I suspect I didn't see issues because my
> test harness didn't induce dropping...
skb->_skb_refdst carries a dst and a flag in the less significative bit
specifying if the dst is refcounted. Passing to the network stack a skb
overloading such bit semanthic is quite alike intentionally corrupting
the kernel memory.
> I originally avoided skb->cb because the reply flag is set at allocation
> and would potentially be clobbered by a pass through the networking
> stack. The reply flag would be used after a pass through the networking
> stack (e.g., during transmission at the device level and when sockets
> close while skbs are still queued for xmit).
I assumed the 'tap_delivered' and 'reply' flag where relevant only
while the skb is owned by the virtio socket. If you need to preserve
such information _after_ delivering the skb to the network stack, that
is quite unfortunate - and skb->cb will not work.
The are a couple of options for adding new metadata inside the skb,
both of them are quite discouraged/need a strong use-case:
- adding new fields in some skb hole
- adding a new skb extension.
Could you please describe the 'reply' and 'tap_delivered' life-cycle
and their interaction with the network stack?
Cheers,
Paolo
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
