On November 27, 2022 7:03:20 PM PST, Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 09:24:34AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On November 24, 2022 3:51:53 AM PST, Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >Similar to the alternative patching, use relative reference for original
>> >instruction rather than absolute one, which saves 8 bytes for one entry
>> >on x86_64. And it could generate R_X86_64_PC32 relocation instead of
>> >R_X86_64_64 relocation, which also reduces relocation metadata on
>> >relocatable builds. And the alignment could be hard coded to be 4 now.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >---
>> > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h | 10 +++++-----
>> > arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h | 8 ++++----
>> > arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 8 +++++---
>> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
>> >index 2851bc2339d5..e56065ea73f2 100644
>> >--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
>> >+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h
>> >@@ -735,16 +735,16 @@ extern void default_banner(void);
>> >
>> > #else /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>> >
>> >-#define _PVSITE(ptype, ops, word, algn) \
>> >+#define _PVSITE(ptype, ops) \
>> > 771:; \
>> > ops; \
>> > 772:; \
>> > .pushsection .parainstructions,"a"; \
>> >- .align algn; \
>> >- word 771b; \
>> >+ .align 4; \
>> >+ .long 771b-.; \
>> > .byte ptype; \
>> > .byte 772b-771b; \
>> >- _ASM_ALIGN; \
>> >+ .align 4; \
>> > .popsection
>> >
>> >
>> >@@ -752,7 +752,7 @@ extern void default_banner(void);
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT_XXL
>> >
>> > #define PARA_PATCH(off) ((off) / 8)
>> >-#define PARA_SITE(ptype, ops) _PVSITE(ptype, ops, .quad, 8)
>> >+#define PARA_SITE(ptype, ops) _PVSITE(ptype, ops)
>> > #define PARA_INDIRECT(addr) *addr(%rip)
>> >
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY
>> >diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> >index 8c1da419260f..68952ae07a3f 100644
>> >--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> >+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt_types.h
>> >@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
>> > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> > /* These all sit in the .parainstructions section to tell us what to patch. */
>> > struct paravirt_patch_site {
>> >- u8 *instr; /* original instructions */
>> >+ s32 instr_offset; /* original instructions */
>> > u8 type; /* type of this instruction */
>> > u8 len; /* length of original instruction */
>> > };
>> >@@ -273,11 +273,11 @@ extern struct paravirt_patch_template pv_ops;
>> > #define _paravirt_alt(insn_string, type) \
>> > "771:\n\t" insn_string "\n" "772:\n" \
>> > ".pushsection .parainstructions,\"a\"\n" \
>> >- _ASM_ALIGN "\n" \
>> >- _ASM_PTR " 771b\n" \
>> >+ " .align 4\n" \
>> >+ " .long 771b-.\n" \
>> > " .byte " type "\n" \
>> > " .byte 772b-771b\n" \
>> >- _ASM_ALIGN "\n" \
>> >+ " .align 4\n" \
>> > ".popsection\n"
>> >
>> > /* Generate patchable code, with the default asm parameters. */
>> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> >index 111b809f0ac2..6eea563a098d 100644
>> >--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> >+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
>> >@@ -1232,20 +1232,22 @@ void __init_or_module apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch_site *start,
>> > {
>> > struct paravirt_patch_site *p;
>> > char insn_buff[MAX_PATCH_LEN];
>> >+ u8 *instr;
>> >
>> > for (p = start; p < end; p++) {
>> > unsigned int used;
>> >
>> >+ instr = (u8 *)&p->instr_offset + p->instr_offset;
>> > BUG_ON(p->len > MAX_PATCH_LEN);
>> > /* prep the buffer with the original instructions */
>> >- memcpy(insn_buff, p->instr, p->len);
>> >- used = paravirt_patch(p->type, insn_buff, (unsigned long)p->instr, p->len);
>> >+ memcpy(insn_buff, instr, p->len);
>> >+ used = paravirt_patch(p->type, insn_buff, (unsigned long)instr, p->len);
>> >
>> > BUG_ON(used > p->len);
>> >
>> > /* Pad the rest with nops */
>> > add_nops(insn_buff + used, p->len - used);
>> >- text_poke_early(p->instr, insn_buff, p->len);
>> >+ text_poke_early(instr, insn_buff, p->len);
>> > }
>> > }
>> > extern struct paravirt_patch_site __start_parainstructions[],
>>
>> Any reason that you couldn't use the same patching code?
>
>Sorry, what do you mean using the same patching code? Do you
>mean that share some code between apply_alternatives() and
>apply_paravirt()?
Yes. Abstract the facility rather than duplicate.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
