Re: [PATCH] vhost_vdpa: fix the crash in unmap a large memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:23 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> While testing in vIOMMU, sometimes guest will unmap very large memory,
> which will cause the crash.

Would you mind to post the calltrace?

> To fix this,Move the iommu_unmap to
> vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap/vhost_vdpa_va_unmap and only unmap the memory
> that saved in iotlb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@xxxxxxxxxx>

Let's add a fixes tag which I believe should be the first commit that
introduces vhost-vDPA. And let's cc stable as well.

> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> index 166044642fd5..c392979702cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c
> @@ -692,6 +692,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>         struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
>         struct page *page;
>         unsigned long pfn, pinned;
> +       struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> +       const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>
>         while ((map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last)) != NULL) {
>                 pinned = PFN_DOWN(map->size);
> @@ -703,6 +705,8 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_pa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>                         unpin_user_page(page);
>                 }
>                 atomic64_sub(PFN_DOWN(map->size), &dev->mm->pinned_vm);
> +               if ((ops->dma_map == NULL) && (ops->set_map == NULL))
> +                       iommu_unmap(v->domain, map->start, map->size);
>                 vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map);
>         }
>  }
> @@ -713,11 +717,15 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_va_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>  {
>         struct vhost_iotlb_map *map;
>         struct vdpa_map_file *map_file;
> +       struct vdpa_device *vdpa = v->vdpa;
> +       const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdpa->config;
>
>         while ((map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last)) != NULL) {
>                 map_file = (struct vdpa_map_file *)map->opaque;
>                 fput(map_file->file);
>                 kfree(map_file);
> +               if ((ops->dma_map == NULL) && (ops->set_map == NULL))
> +                       iommu_unmap(v->domain, map->start, map->size);

I wonder if it's better to move at least dma_map() here.

Thanks

>                 vhost_iotlb_map_free(iotlb, map);
>         }
>  }
> @@ -805,8 +813,6 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_unmap(struct vhost_vdpa *v,
>         } else if (ops->set_map) {
>                 if (!v->in_batch)
>                         ops->set_map(vdpa, asid, iotlb);
> -       } else {
> -               iommu_unmap(v->domain, iova, size);
>         }
>
>         /* If we are in the middle of batch processing, delay the free
> --
> 2.34.3
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux