On 11/10/2022 5:13 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 4:59 PM Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/10/2022 2:29 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
在 2022/11/10 14:20, Zhu, Lingshan 写道:
On 11/10/2022 11:49 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 5:06 PM Zhu, Lingshan
<lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/9/2022 4:59 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 4:14 PM Zhu, Lingshan
<lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/9/2022 2:51 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2022 at 5:42 PM Zhu Lingshan
<lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This series implements features provisioning for ifcvf.
By applying this series, we allow userspace to create
a vDPA device with selected (management device supported)
feature bits and mask out others.
I don't see a direct relationship between the first 3 and the last.
Maybe you can state the reason why the restructure is a must for
the
feature provisioning. Otherwise, we'd better split the series.
When introducing features provisioning ability to ifcvf, there is
a need
to re-create vDPA devices
on a VF with different feature bits.
This seems a requirement even without feature provisioning? Device
could be deleted from the management device anyhow.
Yes, we need this to delete and re-create a vDPA device.
I wonder if we need something that works for -stable.
I can add a fix tag, so these three patches could apply to stable
It's too huge for -stable.
AFAIK, we can move the vdpa_alloc_device() from probe() to dev_add()
and it seems to work?
Yes and this is done in this series and that's why we need these
refactoring code.
I meant there's probably no need to change the association of existing
structure but just do the allocation in dev_add(), then we will have a
patch with much more small changeset that fit for -stable.
Patch 1(ifcvf_base only work on ifcvf_hw) and patch 2(irq functions only
work on ifcvf_hw) are not needed for stable.
I have already done this allocation of ifcvf_adapter which is the
container of struct vdpa_device in dev_add() in Patch 3, this should be
merged to stable.
Patch 3 is huge but necessary, not only allocate ifcvf_adapter in
dev_add(), it also refactors the structures of ifcvf_mgmt_dev and
ifcvf_adapter,
because we need to initialize the VF's hw structure ifcvf_hw(which was a
member of ifcvf_adapter but now should be a member of ifcvf_mgmt_dev) in
probe.
Is it still huge?
Then please reorder the patches, stable-kernel-rules.rst said:
- It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context.
Let's see.
It is over 180 lines, so maybe re-ordering can not help here, I will try
to split patch 3.
Thanks,
Zhu Lingshan
Thanks
Thanks
Thanks
By the way, do you have any comments to the patches?
Thanks,
Zhu Lingshan
Thanks
We create vDPA device from a VF, so without features provisioning
requirements,
we don't need to re-create the vDPA device. But with features
provisioning,
it is a must now.
Thanks
Thakns
When remove a vDPA device, the container of struct vdpa_device
(here is
ifcvf_adapter) is free-ed in
dev_del() interface, so we need to allocate ifcvf_adapter in
dev_add()
than in probe(). That's
why I have re-factored the adapter/mgmt_dev code.
For re-factoring the irq related code and ifcvf_base, let them
work on
struct ifcvf_hw, the
reason is that the adapter is allocated in dev_add(), if we want
theses
functions to work
before dev_add(), like in probe, we need them work on ifcvf_hw
than the
adapter.
Thanks
Zhu Lingshan
Thanks
Please help review
Thanks
Zhu Lingshan (4):
vDPA/ifcvf: ifcvf base layer interfaces work on struct
ifcvf_hw
vDPA/ifcvf: IRQ interfaces work on ifcvf_hw
vDPA/ifcvf: allocate ifcvf_adapter in dev_add()
vDPA/ifcvf: implement features provisioning
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 32 ++-----
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 10 +-
drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 156
+++++++++++++++-----------------
3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
--
2.31.1
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
