On 10/25/2022 9:44 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
Yes, we can add, but I am not sure whether or not this will be practically useful, for e.g. the same command without max_vqp specified may render different number of queues across different devices, or different revisions of the same vendor's devices. Does it complicate the mgmt software even more, I'm not sure.... Could we instead mandate max_vqp to be 1 from vdpa core level if user doesn't explicitly specify the value? That way it is more consistent in terms of the resulting number of queue pairs (=1) with the case where parent device does not offer the _F_MQ feature.在 2022/10/26 09:10, Si-Wei Liu 写道:On 10/24/2022 7:24 PM, Jason Wang wrote:On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 3:14 AM Si-Wei Liu<si-wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:My understanding is that this is not allowed any more since the introduction of max_vqp attribute. Noted, currently we don't have a way for vendor driver to report the default value for mqx_vqp,On 10/24/2022 1:40 AM, Jason Wang wrote:On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 7:49 AM Si-Wei Liu<si-wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:A simple answer would be yes, but the long answer is that I am not sure if there's any for the moment - there's no default value for mtu, mac,Live migration of vdpa would typically require re-instate vdpa device with an idential set of configs on the destination node, same way as how source node created the device in the first place. In order to save orchestration software from memorizing and keeping track of vdpa config, it will be helpful if the vdpa tool provides the aids for exporting the initial configs as-is, the way how vdpa device was created. The "vdpa dev show" command seems to be the right vehicle for that. It is unlike the "vdpa dev config show" command output which usually goes with the live value in the device config space, and is not quite reliable subject to the dynamics of feature negotiation or possible change by the driver to the config space. Examples: 1) Create vDPA by default without any config attribute $ vdpa dev add mgmtdev pci/0000:41:04.2 name vdpa0 $ vdpa dev show vdpa0vdpa0: type network mgmtdev pci/0000:41:04.2 vendor_id 5555 max_vqs 9 max_vq_size 256$ vdpa dev -jp show vdpa0 { "dev": { "vdpa0": { "type": "network", "mgmtdev": "pci/0000:41:04.2", "vendor_id": 5555, "max_vqs": 9, "max_vq_size": 256, } } } 2) Create vDPA with config attribute(s) specified $ vdpa dev add mgmtdev pci/0000:41:04.2 name vdpa0 \ mac e4:11:c6:d3:45:f0 max_vq_pairs 4 $ vdpa dev showvdpa0: type network mgmtdev pci/0000:41:04.2 vendor_id 5555 max_vqs 9 max_vq_size 256initial_config: mac e4:11:c6:d3:45:f0 max_vq_pairs 4 $ vdpa dev -jp show { "dev": { "vdpa0": { "type": "network", "mgmtdev": "pci/0000:41:04.2", "vendor_id": 5555, "max_vqs": 9, "max_vq_size": 256, "initial_config": { "mac": "e4:11:c6:d3:45:f0", "max_vq_pairs": 4 } } } } Signed-off-by: Si-Wei Liu<si-wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c index bebded6..bfb8f54 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa.c@@ -677,6 +677,41 @@ static int vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_del_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *i} static int+vdpa_dev_initcfg_fill(struct vdpa_device *vdev, struct sk_buff *msg, u32 device_id)+{ + struct vdpa_dev_set_config *cfg = &vdev->init_cfg; + int err = -EMSGSIZE; + + if (!cfg->mask) + return 0; + + switch (device_id) { + case VIRTIO_ID_NET:+ if ((cfg->mask & BIT_ULL(VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MACADDR)) != 0 &&+ nla_put(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MACADDR, + sizeof(cfg->net.mac), cfg->net.mac)) + return err;+ if ((cfg->mask & BIT_ULL(VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU)) != 0 && + nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MTU, cfg->net.mtu))+ return err;+ if ((cfg->mask & BIT_ULL(VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP)) != 0 &&+ nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_NET_CFG_MAX_VQP, + cfg->net.max_vq_pairs)) + return err; + break; + default: + break; + } + + if ((cfg->mask & BIT_ULL(VDPA_ATTR_DEV_FEATURES)) != 0 && + nla_put_u64_64bit(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_FEATURES, + cfg->device_features, VDPA_ATTR_PAD)) + return err;A question: If any of those above attributes were not provisioned, should we show the ones that are inherited from the parent?and max_vqp that can be inherited from the parent (max_vqp by default being 1 is spec defined, not something inherited from the parent).Note that it is by default from driver level that if _F_MQ is not negotiated. But I think we are talking about something different that is out of the spec here, what if: vDPA inherit _F_MQ but mqx_vqp is not provisioned via netlink. Or is it not allowed?I think it can be reported in this patch?
Wouldn't it be possible to achieve that by simply checking how many parent mgmtdev instances don't have vdpa device provisioned yet? e.g.if not otherwise specified in the CLI. Without getting the default value reported in 'vdpa mgmtdev show' level, it'd just confuse mgmt software even more.Yes, this is something that we need to fix. And what's more in order to support dynamic provisioning, we need a way to report the number of available instances that could be used for vDPA device provisioning.
inuse=$(vdpa dev show | grep mgmtdev | wc -l) total=$(vdpa mgmtdev show | grep "supported_classes" | wc -l ) echo $((total - inuse))
That was the situation when there's no max_vqp attribute support from vdpa netlink API level. I think now every driver honors the vdpa core disposition to get a single queue pair if max_vqp config is missing.At least some time in the past, mlx5 were enabled with MQ with 8 queue pairs by default.So we have: int vdpa_register_device(struct vdpa_device *vdev, int nvqs)This means technically, parent can allocate a multiqueue devices with _F_MQ features if max_vqp and device_features is not provisioned. And what's more, what happens if _F_MQ is provisioned by max_vqp is not specified?The question is:When a attribute is not specificed/provisioned via net link, what's the default value? The answer should be consistent: if device_features is determined by the parent, we should do the same for mqx_vqp.
OK I got your point.
And it looks to me all of those belongs to the initial config (self-contained)Right. I wonder if we can have vdpa core define the default value (for e.g. max_vqp=1) for those unspecified attribute (esp. when the corresponding device feature is offered and provisioned) whenever possible. Which I think it'll be more consistent for the same command to get to the same result between different vendor drivers. While we still keep the possibility for future extension to allow driver override the vdpa core disposition if the real use case emerges. What do you think?
Right. How's the plan for QEMU to get to the mtu provisioned by netlink, via a new vhost-vdpa ioctl call? If so, will QEMU be able to read it directly from kernel when it comes to the vhost-vdpa backend, without having user to specify host_mtu from CLI?And the mlx5_vdpa driver with 8 queue pairs in the wild days is just irrelevant to be manageable by mgmt software, regardless of live migration.I am not sure I understand the ask here. Noted the QEMU argument has to offer host_mtu=X with the maximum MTU value for guest to use (and applied as the initial MTU config during virtio-net probing for Linux driver),Andthe device_features if inherited is displayed at 'vdpa dev config show' output. Can you remind me of a good example for inherited value that wemay want to show here?Some other cases: 1) MTU: there should be something that the device needs to report if _F_MTU is negotiated even if it is not provisioned from netlink.Adding Cindy.I think it's a known issue that we need to do sanity check to make sure cli parameters matches what is provisioned from netlink.
Noted here the parent might not be necessarily the mgmtdev where vdpa gets created over. It may well end up with the MTU on the PF (uplink port) which the mgmt software has to concern with. My point is the utility and tool chain able to derive the maximal MTU effectively allowed for vDPA device may live out of vDPA's realm. It's a rare or even invalid configuration to have vDPA configured with a bigger value than the MTU on the uplink port or parent device. It's more common when MTU config is involved, it has to be consistently configured across all the network links along, from parent device (uplink port) down to the switchdev representor port, vdpa device, and QEMU virtio-net object.and the way to get the parent device MTU and whether that's relevant to vdpa device's MTU is very vendor specific.So I think the max MTU of parent should be equal to the max MTU of the vDPA.
Yep, maybe. I'm not very sure if this will be very useful to be honest, consider it's kinda a rare case to me were to provision MTU feature without a specific MTU value. If one cares about MTU, mgmt software should configure some mtu through "vdpa dev add ... mtu ...", no?I think we would need new attribute(s) in the mgmtdev level to support what you want here?Not sure, but what I want to ask is consider we provision MTU feature but without max MTU value, do we need to report the initial max MTU here?
On the other hand, no mtu value specified may mean "go with what the uplink port or parent device has". I think this is a pretty useful case if the vendor's NIC supports updating MTU on the fly without having to tear down QEMU and reconfigure vdpa. I'm not sure if we end up with killing this use case by limiting initial max MTU to a fixed value.
Do you want me to relocate to 'vdpa dev show', or it's okay to leave it behind there?Not the way I expected it, but with Lingshan's series to expose fields out of FEATURES_OK, the device_features is now reported through 'vdpa dev config show' regardless being specified or not, if I am not mistaken?2) device_features: if device_features is not provisioned, we should still report it via netlink hereYes.
I think for the most part "initial_config" will be sufficient for those config attributes with "vdpa dev add" equivalents, be it user specified, vdpa enforced default if missing user input, or default overridden by the parent device. "inherited_config" will be useful for the configs with no "vdpa dev add" equivalent or live out side of vdpa tool, but still important for mgmt software to replicate identical vdpa setup. Like max-supported-mtu (for the uplink port or parent device), effective-link-speed, effective-link-status et al. Let's see if there's more when we get there.Currently we export the config attributes upon vdpa creation under the "initial_config" key. If we want to expose more default values inherited from mgmtdev, I think we can wrap up these default values under another key "inherited_config" to display in 'vdpa dev show' output. Does it fit what you have in mind?I wonder if it's better to merge those two, or is there any advantages of splitting them?
Thanks, -Siwei
Yes, as I said earlier, since the device_features attr getting added to the 'vdpa dev config show' command, this divergence started to complicate mgmt software already.or do you mean the mgmt can assume it should be the same as mgmtdev. Anyhow if we don't show device_features if it is not provisioned, it will complicate the mgmt software.Thanks,Thanks-SiweiThanksThanks, -SiweiThanks+ + return 0; +} + +static intvdpa_dev_fill(struct vdpa_device *vdev, struct sk_buff *msg, u32 portid, u32 seq,int flags, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack) {@@ -715,6 +750,10 @@ static int vdpa_nl_cmd_dev_del_set_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *i if (nla_put_u16(msg, VDPA_ATTR_DEV_MIN_VQ_SIZE, min_vq_size))goto msg_err; + err = vdpa_dev_initcfg_fill(vdev, msg, device_id); + if (err) + goto msg_err; + genlmsg_end(msg, hdr); return 0; -- 1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
