Thanks for the reply. > This can be simplified with min_not_zero(). Ok, I will do it in the next version. > It's worth including a comment here that the discard and secure erase > limits are combined because the Linux block layer only has one limit > value. If the block layer supported independent limit values we wouldn't > need to do this. Ok. I'll send a new version once we agree on the max_secure_erase_seg = 0 scenario. Do you have an opinion on that? Do you think that using sg_elems as the number of secure erase/discard segments when the value in the virtio config is 0 is good enough? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
