Re: [PATCH] virtio_bt: Fix alignment in configuration struct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:45:02AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:02:31AM -0700, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > Hi Michael,
> > 
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 1:00 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 08:16:11AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 02:04:43PM +0200, Igor Skalkin wrote:
> > > > > On 8/8/22 01:00, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >     On Mon, Aug 08, 2022 at 12:11:52AM +0200, Igor Skalkin wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >         According to specification [1], "For the device-specific configuration
> > > > >         space, the driver MUST use 8 bit wide accesses for 8 bit wide fields,
> > > > >         16 bit wide and aligned accesses for 16 bit wide fields and 32 bit wide
> > > > >         and aligned accesses for 32 and 64 bit wide fields.".
> > > > >
> > > > >         Current version of the configuration structure:
> > > > >
> > > > >             struct virtio_bt_config {
> > > > >                 __u8  type;
> > > > >                 __u16 vendor;
> > > > >                 __u16 msft_opcode;
> > > > >             } __attribute__((packed));
> > > > >
> > > > >         has both 16bit fields non-aligned.
> > > > >
> > > > >         This commit fixes it.
> > > > >
> > > > >         [1] https://ddec1-0-en-ctp.trendmicro.com:443/wis/clicktime/v1/query?url=https%3a%2f%2fdocs.oasis%2dopen.org%2fvirtio%2fvirtio%2fv1.1%2fvirtio%2dv1.1.pdf&umid=d1786ace-e8ea-40e8-9665-96c0949174e5&auth=53c7c7de28b92dfd96e93d9dd61a23e634d2fbec-39b15885ceebe9fda9357320aec1ccbac416a470
> > > > >
> > > > >         Signed-off-by: Igor Skalkin <Igor.Skalkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > >     This is all true enough, but the problem is
> > > > >     1. changing uapi like this can't be done, will break userspace
> > > > >     2. the driver has more issues and no one seems to want to
> > > > >        maintain it.
> > > > >     I posted a patch "Bluetooth: virtio_bt: mark broken" and intend
> > > > >     to merge it for this release.
> > > > >
> > > > > This is very sad. We already use this driver in our projects.
> > > >
> > > > Really?  Can you step up to maintain it? Then we can fix the issues
> > > > and it won't be broken.
> > >
> > > Just a reminder that I'm waiting for a response on that.
> > > I just don't know enough about bluetooth.
> > 
> > Just a heads up that Marcel is on vacation, he did mention that he had
> > done some work to update virtio_bt thus why I didn't apply any of the
> > changes yet.
> 
> Any update? when does Marcel return?


Annnnnnd ... this is falling between the chairs again?
Guys if anyone wants to use this driver it needs a maintainer.

> > > --
> > > MST
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Luiz Augusto von Dentz

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux