On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:15 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 12:53:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > Adding cond_resched() to the command waiting loop for a better
> > co-operation with the scheduler. This allows to give CPU a breath to
> > run other task(workqueue) instead of busy looping when preemption is
> > not allowed.
> >
> > What's more important. This is a must for some vDPA parent to work
> > since control virtqueue is emulated via a workqueue for those parents.
> >
> > Fixes: bda324fd037a ("vdpasim: control virtqueue support")
>
> That's a weird commit to fix. so it fixes the simulator?
Yes, since the simulator is using a workqueue to handle control virtueue.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index ece00b84e3a7..169368365d6a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -2000,8 +2000,10 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,
> > * into the hypervisor, so the request should be handled immediately.
> > */
> > while (!virtqueue_get_buf(vi->cvq, &tmp) &&
> > - !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq))
> > + !virtqueue_is_broken(vi->cvq)) {
> > + cond_resched();
> > cpu_relax();
> > + }
>
> with cond_resched do we still need cpu_relax?
I think so, it's possible that cond_sched() just doesn't trigger scheduling.
Thanks
>
> > return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
