Re: Virtio-net - add timeouts to control commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/24/22 11:16, Alvaro Karsz wrote:
Hi Jason,

Or reset but can we simply use interrupt instead of the busy waiting?

I agree that timeouts are not needed using interrupts.

Quite the contrary.
There is no guarantee that a completion for a given command will be signaled at all; if the completion is never posted to the virtio queue the VM will spin forever.

This can be done, but seems like a big change.
All functions calling virtnet_send_command expect to get a response immediately.
This may be difficult, since some of the commands are sent in the
probe function.

This is a simplistic approach. _Any_ command sent via virtio will have to have some sort of handling in the host, so an immediate response is not guaranteed.
Especially virtio-block command will _not_ be handled immediately.

Cheers,

Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		           Kernel Storage Architect
hare@xxxxxxx			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux