Re: [virtio-dev] [PATCH] virtio-net: use mtu size as buffer length for big packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 05:06:33PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> 
> > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 12:59 PM
> > 
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 04:22:41PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 12:05 PM
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 04:00:08PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 5:03 AM
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Should we make this depend on the vq reset ability maybe?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The advantage of this is to keep TX working. Or we can use
> > > > > > > device reset as a fallback if there's no vq reset.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Device reset is really annoying in that it loses all the state:
> > > > > > rx filters etc etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > The elegant solution is let driver tell the new mtu to the device.
> > > > > One way to do so is by using existing ctrl vq.
> > > >
> > > > That will need a new feature bit.
> > > >
> > > Yes. ctrl vq can tell what all configuration does it allow. :) Or you
> > > prefer feature bit?
> > 
> > We did feature bits for this in the past.
> > 
> Ok. Will try to draft the update for future.
> 
> Gavin should repost the patch to address comments unrelated to this future bit anyway.
> Right?

Right.

> > > > > If merged buffer is done, and new mtu is > minimum posting size,
> > > > > no need
> > > > to undergo vq reset.
> > > > > If merged buffer is not done, and buffer posted are smaller than
> > > > > new mtu,
> > > > undergo vq reset optionally.
> > > >
> > > > This can be done with or without sending mtu to device.
> > > Yes, telling mtu to device helps device to optimize and adhere to the spec
> > line " The device MUST NOT pass received packets that exceed mtu" in
> > section 5.1.4.1.
> > 
> > Again, that line refers to \field{mtu} which is the max mtu supported,
> > irrespective to anything driver does.
> > 
> > --
> > MST

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux