Re: [PATCH 18/36] cpuidle: Annotate poll_idle()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:46 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The __cpuidle functions will become a noinstr class, as such they need
> explicit annotations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/poll_state.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,10 @@
>  static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>                                struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
>  {
> -       u64 time_start = local_clock();
> +       u64 time_start;
> +
> +       instrumentation_begin();
> +       time_start = local_clock();
>
>         dev->poll_time_limit = false;
>
> @@ -39,6 +42,7 @@ static int __cpuidle poll_idle(struct cp
>         raw_local_irq_disable();
>
>         current_clr_polling();
> +       instrumentation_end();
>
>         return index;
>  }
>
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux