On Tue, Jun 21 2022, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 5:16 PM Cornelia Huck <cohuck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> The ifdeffery looks a big ugly, but I don't have a better idea. > > I guess you meant the ccw part, I leave the spinlock here in V1, but > Michael prefers to have that. Not doing the locking dance is good; I think the #ifdefs all over are a bit ugly, but as I said, I can't think of a good, less-ugly way... > In the future, we may consider removing that, one possible way is to > have a per driver boolean for the hardening. As in "we've reviewed and tested this driver, so let's turn it on for every device bound to it"? _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
