On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:00 PM Eli Cohen <elic@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The control VQ specific information is stored in the dedicated struct > mlx5_control_vq. When the callback is updated through > mlx5_vdpa_set_vq_cb(), make sure to update the control VQ struct. > > Fixes: 5262912ef3cf ("vdpa/mlx5: Add support for control VQ and MAC setting") > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > index 1b6d46b86f81..789c078ff1af 100644 > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c > @@ -1962,6 +1962,8 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_set_vq_cb(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx, struct vdpa_c > struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev); > > ndev->event_cbs[idx] = *cb; > + if (is_ctrl_vq_idx(mvdev, idx)) > + mvdev->cvq.event_cb = *cb; > } > Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx) In the future, I wonder if we can simply just use event_cbs[] since it has took cvq into account: struct vdpa_callback event_cbs[MLX5_MAX_SUPPORTED_VQS + 1]; Thanks > static void mlx5_cvq_notify(struct vringh *vring) > -- > 2.35.1 > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization