On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 4:27 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > arch_cpu_idle() is a very simple idle interface and exposes only a > single idle state and is expected to not require RCU and not do any > tracing/instrumentation. > > As such, omap_sram_idle() is not a valid implementation. Replace it > with the simple (shallow) omap3_do_wfi() call. Leaving the more > complicated idle states for the cpuidle driver. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I see similar code in omap2: omap2_pm_idle() -> omap2_enter_full_retention() -> omap2_sram_suspend() Is that code path safe to use without RCU or does it need a similar change? Arnd _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization