Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] rework on the IRQ hardening of virtio

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:28 AM Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2022 10:53:23 +0200
> Halil Pasic <pasic@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 May 2022 11:59:42 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All:
> >
> > Sorry for being slow on this one. I'm pretty much under water. Will try
> > to get some regression-testing done till tomorrow end of day.
> >
>
> Did some testing with the two stage indicators disabled. Didn't see any
> significant difference in performance, and with that also no performance
> regression. IMHO we are good to go ahead!

Great!

>
> Sorry it took so long.

No worries and thanks a lot for the help.

I will repost a version with some comments tweaked that is suggested
by Cornelia Huck.

Thanks

>
> Regards,
> Halil
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux