On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 7:19 PM Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.yaml > index 10c22b5..29a0932 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/virtio/mmio.yaml > @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ description: > See https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=virtio for > more details. > > +allOf: > + - $ref: /schemas/arm/xen,dev-domid.yaml# > + > properties: > compatible: > const: virtio,mmio > @@ -33,6 +36,10 @@ properties: > description: Required for devices making accesses thru an IOMMU. > maxItems: 1 > > + xen,dev-domid: > + description: Required when Xen grant mappings need to be enabled for device. > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 > + > required: > - compatible > - reg Sorry for joining the discussion late. Have you considered using the generic iommu binding here instead of a custom property? This would mean having a device node for the grant-table mechanism that can be referred to using the 'iommus' phandle property, with the domid as an additional argument. It does not quite fit the model that Linux currently uses for iommus, as that has an allocator for dma_addr_t space, but it would think it's conceptually close enough that it makes sense for the binding. Arnd _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
