Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] vhost-test: drop flush after vhost_dev_cleanup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2022/5/16 04:29, Mike Christie 写道:
The flush after vhost_dev_cleanup is not needed because:

1. It doesn't do anything. vhost_dev_cleanup will stop the worker thread
so the flush call will just return since the worker has not device.

2. It's not needed. The comment about jobs re-queueing themselves does
not look correct because handle_vq does not requeue work.

Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@xxxxxxxxxx>


Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>


---
  drivers/vhost/test.c | 3 ---
  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vhost/test.c b/drivers/vhost/test.c
index 837148d0a6a8..a63a626a554e 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/test.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/test.c
@@ -158,9 +158,6 @@ static int vhost_test_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *f)
  	vhost_test_flush(n);
  	vhost_dev_stop(&n->dev);
  	vhost_dev_cleanup(&n->dev);
-	/* We do an extra flush before freeing memory,
-	 * since jobs can re-queue themselves. */
-	vhost_test_flush(n);
  	kfree(n->dev.vqs);
  	kfree(n);
  	return 0;

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux