On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 11:04:41AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > But my guess is that rwlock + some testing for the legacy indicator case > > just to double check if there is a heavy regression despite of our > > expectations to see none should do the trick. > > I suggest this, rwlock (for not airq) seems better than spinlock, but > at worst case it will cause cache line bouncing. But I wonder if it's > noticeable (anyhow it has been used for airq). > > Thanks Which existing rwlock does airq use right now? Can we take it to sync? -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
