Re: [PATCH v1] vdpa/vp_vdpa : add vdpa tool support in vp_vdpa

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 1:57 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 2:27 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 11:21 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> 在 2022/4/19 09:40, Cindy Lu 写道:
> >> > this patch is to add the support for vdpa tool in vp_vdpa
> >> > here is the example steps
> >> > modprobe vp_vdpa
> >> > modprobe vhost_vdpa
> >> >
> >> > echo 0000:00:06.0>/sys/bus/pci/drivers/virtio-pci/unbind
> >> > echo 1af4 1041 > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/vp-vdpa/new_id
> >> >
> >> > vdpa dev add name vdpa1 mgmtdev pci/0000:00:06.0
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > ---
> >> >   drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> >> >   1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> >> > index cce101e6a940..d8a1d2f8e9bb 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> >> > @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> >> >   #include <linux/virtio_ring.h>
> >> >   #include <linux/virtio_pci.h>
> >> >   #include <linux/virtio_pci_modern.h>
> >> > +#include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
> >> > +#include <uapi/linux/vdpa.h>
> >> >
> >> >   #define VP_VDPA_QUEUE_MAX 256
> >> >   #define VP_VDPA_DRIVER_NAME "vp_vdpa"
> >> > @@ -41,6 +43,18 @@ struct vp_vdpa {
> >> >       int vectors;
> >> >   };
> >> >
> >> > +struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev {
> >> > +     struct vdpa_mgmt_dev mgtdev;
> >> > +     struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa;
> >> > +     struct pci_dev *pdev;
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > +#define VP_VDPA_NET_FEATURES                                                   \
> >> > +     ((1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) | (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) |        \
> >> > +      (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ACCESS_PLATFORM))
> >> > +
> >> > +#define VP_VDPA_NET_VQ_NUM 2
> >>
> >>
> >> Let's not go backwards, e.g we've already support any kind of virtio
> >> device with any kind of features. see the comment in vp_vdpa_probe().
> >>
> >>
> > got it, I will fix this
> >>
> >> > +
> >> >   static struct vp_vdpa *vdpa_to_vp(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> >> >   {
> >> >       return container_of(vdpa, struct vp_vdpa, vdpa);
> >> > @@ -454,9 +468,14 @@ static void vp_vdpa_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> >> >       pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
> >> >   }
> >> >
> >> > -static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> > +static int vp_vdpa_dev_add(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev, const char *name,
> >> > +                        const struct vdpa_dev_set_config *add_config)
> >> >   {
> >> > +     struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev *vp_vdpa_mgtdev =
> >> > +             container_of(v_mdev, struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev, mgtdev);
> >> > +
> >> >       struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev;
> >> > +     struct pci_dev *pdev = vp_vdpa_mgtdev->pdev;
> >> >       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> >       struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa;
> >> >       int ret, i;
> >> > @@ -465,8 +484,9 @@ static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> >       if (ret)
> >> >               return ret;
> >> >
> >> > -     vp_vdpa = vdpa_alloc_device(struct vp_vdpa, vdpa,
> >> > -                                 dev, &vp_vdpa_ops, NULL, false);
> >> > +     vp_vdpa = vdpa_alloc_device(struct vp_vdpa, vdpa, dev, &vp_vdpa_ops,
> >> > +                                 name, false);
> >>
> >>
> >> Nit: let's keep the line of vdpa_alloc_device() unchanged to reduce the
> >> changeset.
> >>
> >>
> > will fix this
> >>
> >> > +
> >> >       if (IS_ERR(vp_vdpa)) {
> >> >               dev_err(dev, "vp_vdpa: Failed to allocate vDPA structure\n");
> >> >               return PTR_ERR(vp_vdpa);
> >> > @@ -480,9 +500,10 @@ static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> >               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to probe modern PCI device\n");
> >> >               goto err;
> >> >       }
> >> > +     vp_vdpa_mgtdev->vp_vdpa = vp_vdpa;
> >> >
> >> >       pci_set_master(pdev);
> >> > -     pci_set_drvdata(pdev, vp_vdpa);
> >> > +     pci_set_drvdata(pdev, vp_vdpa_mgtdev);
> >> >
> >> >       vp_vdpa->vdpa.dma_dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> >       vp_vdpa->queues = vp_modern_get_num_queues(mdev);
> >> > @@ -516,7 +537,8 @@ static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> >       }
> >> >       vp_vdpa->config_irq = VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR;
> >> >
> >> > -     ret = vdpa_register_device(&vp_vdpa->vdpa, vp_vdpa->queues);
> >> > +     vp_vdpa->vdpa.mdev = &vp_vdpa_mgtdev->mgtdev;
> >> > +     ret = _vdpa_register_device(&vp_vdpa->vdpa, vp_vdpa->queues);
> >> >       if (ret) {
> >> >               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register to vdpa bus\n");
> >> >               goto err;
> >> > @@ -529,12 +551,60 @@ static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> >       return ret;
> >> >   }
> >> >
> >> > -static void vp_vdpa_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >> > +static void vp_vdpa_dev_del(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev,
> >> > +                         struct vdpa_device *dev)
> >> >   {
> >> > -     struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > +     struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev *vp_vdpa_mgtdev =
> >> > +             container_of(v_mdev, struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev, mgtdev);
> >> > +
> >> > +     struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa = vp_vdpa_mgtdev->vp_vdpa;
> >> >
> >> >       vp_modern_remove(&vp_vdpa->mdev);
> >> > -     vdpa_unregister_device(&vp_vdpa->vdpa);
> >> > +     _vdpa_unregister_device(&vp_vdpa->vdpa);
> >> > +     vp_vdpa_mgtdev->vp_vdpa = NULL;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static const struct vdpa_mgmtdev_ops vp_vdpa_mdev_ops = {
> >> > +     .dev_add = vp_vdpa_dev_add,
> >> > +     .dev_del = vp_vdpa_dev_del,
> >> > +};
> >> > +
> >> > +static struct virtio_device_id vp_vdpa_id_table[] = {
> >> > +     { VIRTIO_ID_NET, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> >> > +     { 0 },
> >> > +};
> >>
> >>
> >> Let's not limit the vp_vdpa to net, it can support all other virtio devices.
> >>
> >>
> > sure, will fix this
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > +static int vp_vdpa_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
> >> > +{
> >> > +     struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev *vp_vdpa_mgtdev;
> >> > +     struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *mgtdev;
> >> > +     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> >> > +     int err;
> >> > +
> >> > +     vp_vdpa_mgtdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*vp_vdpa_mgtdev), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> > +     if (!vp_vdpa_mgtdev)
> >> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> >> > +     mgtdev = &vp_vdpa_mgtdev->mgtdev;
> >> > +
> >> > +     mgtdev->ops = &vp_vdpa_mdev_ops;
> >> > +     mgtdev->device = dev;
> >> > +     mgtdev->id_table = vp_vdpa_id_table;
> >> > +     vp_vdpa_mgtdev->pdev = pdev;
> >> > +
> >> > +     mgtdev->max_supported_vqs = VP_VDPA_NET_VQ_NUM;
> >>
> >>
> >> Let's read this from the device instead of using the hard-coded value.
> >>
> >>
> >> > +     mgtdev->supported_features = VP_VDPA_NET_FEATURES;
> >>
> >>
> >> Let's read this from the device.
> >>
> > sure will fix this
> HI Jason, I have check the code, maybe we can't read these
> informations from device here,
> because the  virtio_pci_modern_device   was inited in vp_vdpa_dev_add(),
> if we want to read these information in vp_vdpa_probe(). maybe we need
> to change the struct in vp_vdpa. and separate the
> struct virtio_pci_modern_device  from struct vp_vdpa. I'm not sure if
> this is ok to do?

Any reason we can't do vdpa_alloc_device() in the vp_vdpa_probe() and
register it in dev_add?

If we can't I'd then decouple virtio_pci_moder_device out of vp_vdpa:

struct vp_vdpa {
    struct vdpa_device vdpa;
    struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev;
};

Thanks

>
> struct vp_vdpa {
> struct vdpa_device vdpa;
> struct virtio_pci_modern_device mdev;
> struct vp_vring *vring;
> struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
> char msix_name[VP_VDPA_NAME_SIZE];
> int config_irq;
> int queues;
> int vectors;
> };
> Thanks
> cindy
> >>
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > +     err = vdpa_mgmtdev_register(mgtdev);
> >>
> >>
> >> Do we need to free the vp_vdpa_mgtdev here?
> >>
> > will add the this
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >> > +
> >> > +     return err;
> >> > +}
> >> > +
> >> > +static void vp_vdpa_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >> > +{
> >> > +     struct vp_vdpa_mgmtdev *vp_vdpa_mgtdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> >> > +
> >> > +     vdpa_mgmtdev_unregister(&vp_vdpa_mgtdev->mgtdev);
> >> > +     kfree(vp_vdpa_mgtdev);
> >> >   }
> >> >
> >> >   static struct pci_driver vp_vdpa_driver = {
> >>
>

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux