Hi Christoph,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 06:05:04AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH 15/27] block: use bdev_alignment_offset in
> part_alignment_offset_show
>
> Replace the open coded offset calculation with the proper helper.
> This is an ABI change in that the -1 for a misaligned partition is
> properly propagated, which can be considered a bug fix and maches
s/maches/matches/
> what is done on the whole device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
> block/partitions/core.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/partitions/core.c b/block/partitions/core.c
> index 2ef8dfa1e5c85..240b3fff521e4 100644
> --- a/block/partitions/core.c
> +++ b/block/partitions/core.c
> @@ -200,11 +200,7 @@ static ssize_t part_ro_show(struct device *dev,
> static ssize_t part_alignment_offset_show(struct device *dev,
> struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> {
> - struct block_device *bdev = dev_to_bdev(dev);
> -
> - return sprintf(buf, "%u\n",
> - queue_limit_alignment_offset(&bdev_get_queue(bdev)->limits,
> - bdev->bd_start_sect));
> + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", bdev_alignment_offset(dev_to_bdev(dev)));
Should this now be %d instead of %u, there are one or two examples of
both in the rest of the patch series.
Alan
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
