On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 07:04:02PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> XDP xmit uses virtio dma api for DMA operations. No longer let virtio
> core manage DMA address.
>
> To record the DMA address, allocate a space in the xdp_frame headroom to
> store the DMA address.
>
> Introduce virtnet_return_xdp_frame() to release the xdp frame and
> complete the dma unmap operation.
This commit suffers from the same issue as most other commits
in this series: log just repeats what patch is doing without
adding motivation.
So with this patch applied, what happened exactly? Did something
previously broken start working now?
This is what we want in the commit log, first of all.
Thanks!
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index a801ea40908f..0efbf7992a95 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -321,6 +321,20 @@ static struct page *get_a_page(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> return p;
> }
>
> +static void virtnet_return_xdp_frame(struct send_queue *sq,
> + struct xdp_frame *frame)
> +{
> + struct virtnet_info *vi = sq->vq->vdev->priv;
> + dma_addr_t *p_addr, addr;
> +
> + p_addr = frame->data - sizeof(*p_addr);
> + addr = *p_addr;
> +
> + virtio_dma_unmap(&vi->vdev->dev, addr, frame->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +
> + xdp_return_frame(frame);
> +}
> +
> static void virtqueue_napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *napi,
> struct virtqueue *vq)
> {
> @@ -504,9 +518,11 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
> {
> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr;
> + struct device *dev = &vi->vdev->dev;
> + dma_addr_t addr, *p_addr;
> int err;
>
> - if (unlikely(xdpf->headroom < vi->hdr_len))
> + if (unlikely(xdpf->headroom < vi->hdr_len + sizeof(addr)))
> return -EOVERFLOW;
>
> /* Make room for virtqueue hdr (also change xdpf->headroom?) */
> @@ -516,10 +532,21 @@ static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> memset(hdr, 0, vi->hdr_len);
> xdpf->len += vi->hdr_len;
>
> - sg_init_one(sq->sg, xdpf->data, xdpf->len);
> + p_addr = xdpf->data - sizeof(addr);
> +
> + addr = virtio_dma_map(dev, xdpf->data, xdpf->len, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> +
> + if (virtio_dma_mapping_error(dev, addr))
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + *p_addr = addr;
> +
> + sg_init_table(sq->sg, 1);
> + sq->sg->dma_address = addr;
> + sq->sg->length = xdpf->len;
>
> - err = virtqueue_add_outbuf(sq->vq, sq->sg, 1, xdp_to_ptr(xdpf),
> - GFP_ATOMIC);
> + err = virtqueue_add_outbuf_premapped(sq->vq, sq->sg, 1,
> + xdp_to_ptr(xdpf), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (unlikely(err))
> return -ENOSPC; /* Caller handle free/refcnt */
>
> @@ -600,7 +627,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
> struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
>
> bytes += frame->len;
> - xdp_return_frame(frame);
> + virtnet_return_xdp_frame(sq, frame);
> } else {
> struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
>
> @@ -1486,7 +1513,7 @@ static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
>
> bytes += frame->len;
> - xdp_return_frame(frame);
> + virtnet_return_xdp_frame(sq, frame);
> }
> packets++;
> }
> @@ -2815,7 +2842,8 @@ static void free_unused_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> if (!is_xdp_frame(buf))
> dev_kfree_skb(buf);
> else
> - xdp_return_frame(ptr_to_xdp(buf));
> + virtnet_return_xdp_frame(vi->sq + i,
> + ptr_to_xdp(buf));
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.0
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
