Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] virtio: split: virtqueue_add_split() support dma address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2022/2/10 下午4:51, Xuan Zhuo 写道:
virtqueue_add_split() only supports virtual addresses, dma is completed
in virtqueue_add_split().

In some scenarios (such as the AF_XDP scenario), the memory is allocated
and DMA is completed in advance, so it is necessary for us to support
passing the DMA address to virtqueue_add_split().

And record this predma information in extra->flags, which can be skipped
when executing dma unmap.

Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index cf9d118668f1..d32c0bf6016f 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@
  #define LAST_ADD_TIME_INVALID(vq)
  #endif
+/* This means the buffer dma is pre-alloc. Just used by vring_desc_extra */
+#define VIRTIO_DESC_F_PREDMA (1 << 15)


I suggest to use a new field in desc_extra to avoid conflict with future virtio extension.


+
  struct vring_desc_state_split {
  	void *data;			/* Data for callback. */
  	struct vring_desc *indir_desc;	/* Indirect descriptor, if any. */
@@ -387,7 +390,7 @@ static void vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
  }
static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
-					  unsigned int i)
+					  unsigned int i, bool predma)
  {
  	struct vring_desc_extra *extra = vq->split.desc_extra;
  	u16 flags;
@@ -404,6 +407,9 @@ static unsigned int vring_unmap_one_split(const struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
  				 (flags & VRING_DESC_F_WRITE) ?
  				 DMA_FROM_DEVICE : DMA_TO_DEVICE);
  	} else {
+		if (predma)
+			goto out;
+
  		dma_unmap_page(vring_dma_dev(vq),
  			       extra[i].addr,
  			       extra[i].len,
@@ -474,7 +480,8 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
  				      unsigned int in_sgs,
  				      void *data,
  				      void *ctx,
-				      gfp_t gfp)
+				      gfp_t gfp,
+				      bool predma)
  {
  	struct vring_virtqueue *vq = to_vvq(_vq);
  	struct scatterlist *sg;
@@ -535,9 +542,16 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
for (n = 0; n < out_sgs; n++) {
  		for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
-			dma_addr_t addr = vring_map_one_sg(vq, sg, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
-			if (vring_mapping_error(vq, addr))
-				goto unmap_release;
+			dma_addr_t addr;
+
+			if (predma) {
+				addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
+
+			} else {
+				addr = vring_map_one_sg(vq, sg, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+				if (vring_mapping_error(vq, addr))
+					goto unmap_release;
+			}
prev = i;
  			/* Note that we trust indirect descriptor
@@ -550,9 +564,16 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
  	}
  	for (; n < (out_sgs + in_sgs); n++) {
  		for (sg = sgs[n]; sg; sg = sg_next(sg)) {
-			dma_addr_t addr = vring_map_one_sg(vq, sg, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-			if (vring_mapping_error(vq, addr))
-				goto unmap_release;
+			dma_addr_t addr;
+
+			if (predma) {
+				addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
+
+			} else {
+				addr = vring_map_one_sg(vq, sg, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+				if (vring_mapping_error(vq, addr))
+					goto unmap_release;
+			}
prev = i;
  			/* Note that we trust indirect descriptor
@@ -602,6 +623,9 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
  	else
  		vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc = ctx;
+ if (predma)
+		vq->split.desc_extra[head].flags |= VIRTIO_DESC_F_PREDMA;
+
  	/* Put entry in available array (but don't update avail->idx until they
  	 * do sync). */
  	avail = vq->split.avail_idx_shadow & (vq->split.vring.num - 1);
@@ -626,6 +650,9 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
  	return 0;
unmap_release:
+	if (predma)
+		goto skip_unmap;
+


Nit: we probably need a better name for the label how about "unmap_free"?

Thanks


  	err_idx = i;
if (indirect)
@@ -640,9 +667,10 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add_split(struct virtqueue *_vq,
  			vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &desc[i]);
  			i = virtio16_to_cpu(_vq->vdev, desc[i].next);
  		} else
-			i = vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i);
+			i = vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i, false);
  	}
+skip_unmap:
  	if (indirect)
  		kfree(desc);
@@ -686,20 +714,24 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
  {
  	unsigned int i, j;
  	__virtio16 nextflag = cpu_to_virtio16(vq->vq.vdev, VRING_DESC_F_NEXT);
+	bool predma = false;
/* Clear data ptr. */
  	vq->split.desc_state[head].data = NULL;
+ if (vq->split.desc_extra[head].flags & VIRTIO_DESC_F_PREDMA)
+		predma = true;
+
  	/* Put back on free list: unmap first-level descriptors and find end */
  	i = head;
while (vq->split.vring.desc[i].flags & nextflag) {
-		vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i);
+		vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i, predma);
  		i = vq->split.desc_extra[i].next;
  		vq->vq.num_free++;
  	}
- vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i);
+	vring_unmap_one_split(vq, i, predma);
  	vq->split.desc_extra[i].next = vq->free_head;
  	vq->free_head = head;
@@ -721,8 +753,10 @@ static void detach_buf_split(struct vring_virtqueue *vq, unsigned int head,
  				VRING_DESC_F_INDIRECT));
  		BUG_ON(len == 0 || len % sizeof(struct vring_desc));
- for (j = 0; j < len / sizeof(struct vring_desc); j++)
-			vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &indir_desc[j]);
+		if (!predma) {
+			for (j = 0; j < len / sizeof(struct vring_desc); j++)
+				vring_unmap_one_split_indirect(vq, &indir_desc[j]);
+		}
kfree(indir_desc);
  		vq->split.desc_state[head].indir_desc = NULL;
@@ -1788,7 +1822,7 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
  	return vq->packed_ring ? virtqueue_add_packed(_vq, sgs, total_sg,
  					out_sgs, in_sgs, data, ctx, gfp) :
  				 virtqueue_add_split(_vq, sgs, total_sg,
-					out_sgs, in_sgs, data, ctx, gfp);
+					out_sgs, in_sgs, data, ctx, gfp, predma);
  }
/**

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux