Hi all, On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 7:41 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 在 2022/2/8 下午9:09, Andrew Melnichenko 写道: > > Hi people, > > Can you please review this series? > > > Are there any performance number to demonstrate the difference? > > Thanks > Yeah, I've used udpgso_bench from Linux to test. Here are some numbers: Sending packets with size 10000 Without USO: ``` $ ./udpgso_bench_tx -4 -D 192.168.15.1 -s 10000 -S 1000 random: crng init done random: 7 urandom warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting udp tx: 36 MB/s 3863 calls/s 3863 msg/s udp tx: 32 MB/s 3360 calls/s 3360 msg/s udp tx: 31 MB/s 3340 calls/s 3340 msg/s udp tx: 31 MB/s 3353 calls/s 3353 msg/s udp tx: 32 MB/s 3359 calls/s 3359 msg/s udp tx: 32 MB/s 3370 calls/s 3370 msg/s ``` With USO: ``` $ ./udpgso_bench_tx -4 -D 192.168.15.1 -s 10000 -S 1000 random: crng init done random: 7 urandom warning(s) missed due to ratelimiting udp tx: 120 MB/s 12596 calls/s 12596 msg/s udp tx: 122 MB/s 12885 calls/s 12885 msg/s udp tx: 120 MB/s 12667 calls/s 12667 msg/s udp tx: 123 MB/s 12969 calls/s 12969 msg/s udp tx: 116 MB/s 12232 calls/s 12232 msg/s udp tx: 108 MB/s 11389 calls/s 11389 msg/s ``` > > > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:32 AM Yuri Benditovich > > <yuri.benditovich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:54 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:46:57 +0200, Andrew Melnychenko <andrew@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> Added new offloads for TUN devices TUN_F_USO4 and TUN_F_USO6. > >>>> Technically they enable NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 > >>>> (and only if USO4 & USO6 are set simultaneously). > >>>> It allows to transmission of large UDP packets. > >>>> > >>>> Different features USO4 and USO6 are required for qemu where Windows guests can > >>>> enable disable USO receives for IPv4 and IPv6 separately. > >>>> On the other side, Linux can't really differentiate USO4 and USO6, for now. > >>>> For now, to enable USO for TUN it requires enabling USO4 and USO6 together. > >>>> In the future, there would be a mechanism to control UDP_L4 GSO separately. > >>>> > >>>> Test it WIP Qemu https://github.com/daynix/qemu/tree/Dev_USOv2 > >>>> > >>>> New types for VirtioNet already on mailing: > >>>> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/202110/msg00010.html > >>> Seems like this hasn't been upvoted yet. > >>> > >>> https://github.com/oasis-tcs/virtio-spec#use-of-github-issues > >> Yes, correct. This is a reason why this series of patches is RFC. > >> > >>> Thanks. > >>> > >>>> Also, there is a known issue with transmitting packages between two guests. > >>>> Without hacks with skb's GSO - packages are still segmented on the host's postrouting. > >>>> > >>>> Andrew Melnychenko (5): > >>>> uapi/linux/if_tun.h: Added new ioctl for tun/tap. > >>>> driver/net/tun: Added features for USO. > >>>> uapi/linux/virtio_net.h: Added USO types. > >>>> linux/virtio_net.h: Added Support for GSO_UDP_L4 offload. > >>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c: Added USO support. > >>>> > >>>> drivers/net/tap.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- > >>>> drivers/net/tun.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- > >>>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- > >>>> include/linux/virtio_net.h | 11 +++++++++++ > >>>> include/uapi/linux/if_tun.h | 3 +++ > >>>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_net.h | 4 ++++ > >>>> 6 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> 2.34.1 > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Virtualization mailing list > >>>> Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
