Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] virtio: support advance DMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 11:32:52 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 5:00 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:19:44 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:51 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > virtqueue_add() only supports virtual addresses, dma is completed in
> > > > virtqueue_add().
> > > >
> > > > In some scenarios (such as the AF_XDP scenario), DMA is completed in advance, so
> > > > it is necessary for us to support passing the DMA address to virtqueue_add().
> > >
> > > I'd suggest rename this feature as "unmanaged DMA".
> >
> > OK
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Record this predma information in extra->flags, which can be skipped when
> > > > executing dma unmap.
> > >
> > > Question still, can we use per-virtqueue flag instead of per
> > > descriptor flag? If my memory is correct, the answer is yes in the
> > > discussion for the previous version.
> > >
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > per-virtqueue? I guess it should be per-submit.
> >
> > This patch set only adds a flag to desc_extra[head].flags, so that we can know
> > if we need to unmap dma when we detach.
>
> I meant if we can manage to make it per virtqueue, there's no need to
> maintain per buffer flag.
>

Rethinking this question, I feel there is no essential difference between per
virtqueue and per sgs.

per virtqueue:
	1. add buf:
		a. check vq->premapped for map every sg
	2. detach:
	        a. check vq->premaped for unmap

per sgs:
	1. add buf:
	        a. check function parameter "premapped" for map every sg
		b. add flag to extra[head].flag

	2. detach:
	        a: check extra[head].flag for unmap


Thanks.


> So we know something that needs to be mapped by virtio core itself,
> e.g the indirect page. Other than this, all the rest could be
> pre-mapped.
>
> For vnet header, it could be mapped by virtio-net which could be still
> treated as pre mapped DMA since it's not the virtio ring code.
>
> Anything I miss here?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > >
> > > > v1:
> > > >    1. All sgs requested at one time are required to be unified PREDMA, and several
> > > >       of them are not supported to be PREDMA
> > > >    2. virtio_dma_map() is removed from this patch set and will be submitted
> > > >       together with the next time AF_XDP supports virtio dma
> > > >    3. Added patch #2 #3 to remove the check for flags when performing unmap
> > > >       indirect desc
> > > >
> > > > Xuan Zhuo (6):
> > > >   virtio: rename vring_unmap_state_packed() to
> > > >     vring_unmap_extra_packed()
> > > >   virtio: remove flags check for unmap split indirect desc
> > > >   virtio: remove flags check for unmap packed indirect desc
> > > >   virtio: virtqueue_add() support predma
> > > >   virtio: split: virtqueue_add_split() support dma address
> > > >   virtio: packed: virtqueue_add_packed() support dma address
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.31.0
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux