Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] virtio: support advance DMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 18 Feb 2022 04:24:58 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 04:55:23PM +0800, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:19:44 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 4:51 PM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > virtqueue_add() only supports virtual addresses, dma is completed in
> > > > virtqueue_add().
> > > >
> > > > In some scenarios (such as the AF_XDP scenario), DMA is completed in advance, so
> > > > it is necessary for us to support passing the DMA address to virtqueue_add().
> > >
> > > I'd suggest rename this feature as "unmanaged DMA".
> >
> > OK
>
> IIUC when you say "dma is completed" you really mean "memory is mapped
> for dma". What is special is that virtio suddenly gets s/g that is
> already mapped for DMA, not in the way DMA (direct memory access) itself
> happens. right? Pls document as such.
> And this is why I'd call this flag "mapped" or "premapped", not
> "predma". "unmanaged" is also ok, though it's a bit vague wrt what
> exactly is managed.
> I'll defer to Jason on this.  Jason what do you prefer?

OK. Thanks

>
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Record this predma information in extra->flags, which can be skipped when
> > > > executing dma unmap.
> > >
> > > Question still, can we use per-virtqueue flag instead of per
> > > descriptor flag? If my memory is correct, the answer is yes in the
> > > discussion for the previous version.
> > >
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > per-virtqueue? I guess it should be per-submit.
> >
> > This patch set only adds a flag to desc_extra[head].flags, so that we can know
> > if we need to unmap dma when we detach.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > >
> > > > v1:
> > > >    1. All sgs requested at one time are required to be unified PREDMA, and several
> > > >       of them are not supported to be PREDMA
> > > >    2. virtio_dma_map() is removed from this patch set and will be submitted
> > > >       together with the next time AF_XDP supports virtio dma
> > > >    3. Added patch #2 #3 to remove the check for flags when performing unmap
> > > >       indirect desc
> > > >
> > > > Xuan Zhuo (6):
> > > >   virtio: rename vring_unmap_state_packed() to
> > > >     vring_unmap_extra_packed()
> > > >   virtio: remove flags check for unmap split indirect desc
> > > >   virtio: remove flags check for unmap packed indirect desc
> > > >   virtio: virtqueue_add() support predma
> > > >   virtio: split: virtqueue_add_split() support dma address
> > > >   virtio: packed: virtqueue_add_packed() support dma address
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 199 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 126 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.31.0
> > > >
> > >
>
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization



[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux