Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement device MSIX vector allocator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
This commit implements a MSIX vector allocation helper
for vqs and config interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
index d1a6b5ab543c..44c89ab0b6da 100644
--- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
@@ -58,14 +58,45 @@ static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
  	ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
  }
+/* ifcvf MSIX vectors allocator, this helper tries to allocate
+ * vectors for all virtqueues and the config interrupt.
+ * It returns the number of allocated vectors, negative
+ * return value when fails.
+ */
+static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
+	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
+	int max_intr, ret;
+
+	/* all queues and config interrupt  */
+	max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
+	ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, 1, max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
+
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	if (ret < max_intr)
+		IFCVF_INFO(pdev,
+			   "Requested %u vectors, however only %u allocated, lower performance\n",
+			   max_intr, ret);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
  static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
  {
  	struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
  	struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
-	int vector, i, ret, irq;
+	int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
  	u16 max_intr;
- /* all queues and config interrupt */
+	nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
+	if (!(nvectors > 0))
+		return nvectors;


Why not simply checking by using nvectors <= 0? If ifcvf_alloc_vectors can return 0 this breaks the ifcvf_request_irq() caller's assumption.


+
  	max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,


So irq is allocated twice here?

Thanks


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux