On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 05:17:43PM +0800, Zhu Lingshan wrote: > When irq number is negative(e.g., -EINVAL), the virtqueue > may be disabled or the virtqueues are sharing a device irq. > In such case, we should not setup irq offloading for a virtqueue. > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/vhost/vdpa.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > index 851539807bc9..909891d518e8 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vdpa.c > @@ -96,6 +96,9 @@ static void vhost_vdpa_setup_vq_irq(struct vhost_vdpa *v, u16 qid) > if (!ops->get_vq_irq) > return; > > + if (irq < 0) > + return; > + > irq = ops->get_vq_irq(vdpa, qid); So it's used before it's initialized. Ugh. How was this patchset tested? > irq_bypass_unregister_producer(&vq->call_ctx.producer); > if (!vq->call_ctx.ctx || irq < 0) > -- > 2.27.0 _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
