On Tue, Jan 18 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 01:38:42PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 17 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 02:31:49PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> >> >> >> 在 2022/1/15 上午4:09, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道: >> >> > @@ -495,6 +494,10 @@ int virtio_device_restore(struct virtio_device *dev) >> >> > /* We have a driver! */ >> >> > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER); >> >> > + ret = dev->config->finalize_features(dev); >> >> > + if (ret) >> >> > + goto err; >> >> >> >> >> >> Is this part of code related? >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> > >> > Yes. virtio_finalize_features no longer calls dev->config->finalize_features. >> > >> > I think the dev->config->finalize_features callback is actually >> > a misnomer now, it just sends the features to device, >> > finalize is FEATURES_OK. Renaming that is a bigger >> > patch though, and I'd like this one to be cherry-pickable >> > to stable. >> >> Do we want to add a comment before the calls to ->finalize_features() >> (/* write features to device */) and adapt the comment in virtio_ring.h? >> Should still be stable-friendly, and giving the callback a better name >> can be a follow-up patch. > > Sorry which comment in virtio_ring.h? > Could not find anything. Typo; I ment virtio_config.h... > >> > >> >> > + >> >> > ret = virtio_finalize_features(dev); >> >> > if (ret) >> >> > goto err; _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
