On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 09:20:12AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 28 Dec 2021 17:33:39 -0800 Florian Fainelli wrote: > > It would be nice if we used the number of files rebuilt because of a > > header file change as another metric that the kernel is evaluated with > > from release to release (or even on a commit by commit basis). Food for > > thought. > > Maybe Andy has some thoughts, he has been working on dropping > unnecessary includes of kernel.h, it seems. With this [1] announcement I believe Ingo is the best to tell you if this is a right direction. > It'd be cool to plug something that'd warn us about significant > increases in dependencies into the patchwork build bot. > > I have one more small series which un-includes uapi/bpf.h from > netdevice.h at which point I hope we'll be largely in the clear > from build bot performance perspective. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/YdIfz+LMewetSaEB@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
