On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:27:17PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > On 11/29/2021 06:19 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 06:13:22PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > > > No need to generate virtio_fs.o first and then link to virtiofs.o, just > > > rename virtio_fs.c to virtiofs.c and remove "virtiofs-y := virtio_fs.o" > > > in Makefile, also update MAINTAINERS. Additionally, rename the private > > > header file fuse_i.h to fuse.h, like ext4.h in fs/ext4, xfs.h in fs/xfs > > > and f2fs.h in fs/f2fs. > > > > There are two separate changes in this patch (virtio_fs.c -> virtiofs.c > > and fuse_i.h -> fuse.h). A patch series with two patches would be easier > > to review and cleaner to backport. > > > > I'm happy with renaming virtio_fs.c to virtiofs.c: > > > > Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hi Stefan and Miklos, > > Thanks for your reply, what should I do now? > > (1) split this patch into two separate patches to send v3; > (2) just ignore this patch because > "This will make backport of bugfixes harder for no good reason." > said by Miklos. I agree with Miklos that there does not seem to be a very strong reason to rename. It probably falls in the category of nice to have cleanup. But it will also make backports harder. So I also like the idea of not making this change. Vivek _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
